applicants of the available domestic remedies, and the decisions given in those proceedings merely highlighted that the existing legal situation had arisen in the 1950s (compare and contrast Zorica Jovanović

S'appuyant sur la décision Jovanovic   c.

Romania , no. 13589/07, §   50, 10   January   2012, and Jovanovic v. Sweden , no. 10592/12, §   53, 22   October   2015). This provision reads as follows: “1.

2006       27/06/2008   09/01/2017 10 year(s) and 9 month(s) and 7 day(s)   09/01/2017 8 year(s) and 6 month(s) and 14 day(s) 170 2,000     3859/17 29/12/2016 Ruža Jovanović

/06) The 11 applicants are: Mustafa Kurić, Ljubomir Petreš, Velimir Dabetić, and Ilfan Sadik Ademi, all stateless persons; Milan Makuc (now deceased), and Ana Mezga, both Croatian nationals; Jovan Jovanović

circumstances, being the master of characterisation to be given in law to the facts of the case, the Court will consider this complaint solely under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, for instance, Jovanović

74235/13 30/03/2012 Zoran PANTOVIĆ , 16/08/1953, Čačak        74236/13 30/03/2012 Branko TEŠIĆ , 05/04/1959, Čačak        74238/13 30/03/2012 Jovan JOVANOVIĆ

Jovanović, a lawyer practising in Belgrade. A.     The circumstances of the case 2.     The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 1.

généralement reconnus, la Convention ne s’applique, à l’égard de chacun des Etats contractants, qu’aux faits survenus après son entrée en vigueur dans l’Etat concerné (voir, parmi beaucoup d’autres, Jovanović

  However, the authorities should respect and apply domestic legislation in a foreseeable and consistent manner (see Jovanović v. Serbia , no. 32299/08, §   50, 2   October 2012).

    The Court notes that having a statutory threshold for the value of a claim for appeals to the Supreme Court is a legitimate and reasonable procedural requirement (see, for example, Jovanović

applicant”), Mr Dragan Jevtić (“the fourth applicant”), Mr Darko Glišović (“the fifth applicant”), Mr Radoš Mihajlović (“the sixth applicant”), Mr Ljubiša Janićijevic (“the seventh applicant”), Mr Nenad Jovanović

Jandrijeska Jovanova, on behalf of the “ Helsinki Committee for Human Rights of the Republic of Macedonia”. The Macedonian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs R.

;   30/01/2014   pending More than 10 year(s) and 24   day(s)   pending More than 4 year(s) and 9   month(s) and 24 day(s)   1,000 350   39903/16 30/06/2016 Jozo Jozanović

that provision unless it is “in accordance with the law”, pursues one of the legitimate aims under Article 8 § 2 and can be regarded as necessary in democratic society (see, among other authorities, Jovanovic

  Jandrijeska ‑ Jovanova, a lawyer practising in Skopje. 2.     The Government of North Macedonia (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms D. Djonova.

après la date susmentionnée, dans lesquelles les requérants n’avaient pas saisi la Cour constitutionnelle, ont été déclarées irrecevables pour non-épuisement des voies de recours internes ( Živomir Jovanović

soulèvent des questions au regard de la Convention puissent être examinées dans un délai raisonnable et que les décisions passées ne soient pas indéfiniment susceptibles d’être remises en cause ( Zorica Jovanović

Petreš et Jovanović, qui avaient obtenu des permis de séjour permanent, et les griefs des autres requérants pour le surplus.