xa0; Darian Pavli , President,   Andreas Zünd ,   Frédéric Krenc , judges, and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various

    In total, the dangerous detainee regime was applied to the applicant for four years, one month and nine days. C.     Particular aspects of the regime 23.

Y Q, Mme N DQ, l'association Fédération Le Regain, M.

case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various

Ovruch District Court of Zhytomyr Region, 09/06/2010 Not enforced   23300/13 21/03/2013 Valentyna Mykolayivna IVASHKO 17/11/1970 Lystvyn Ukrainian Ovruch District Court of Zhytomyr Region, 22/02/

    Imposition of the “dangerous detainee” regime 8.

Both applicants lived in Tikhoretsk, Krasnodar region, before their arrest. They are at present serving their sentences in Stavropol region after conviction. A.

And the first mass deportations of the Chechens during the Soviet regime began in the years of collectivisation and cultural revolution, in other words during Stalin’s regime.

    In order to obtain those approvals the applicant used various techniques.

    The circumstances of the cases The applicants are Russian nationals living in various regions of the Russian Federation. Their names and dates of birth are tabulated below.

Most of the applicants submitted medical proof that they had suffered from injuries of various degrees, which, according to them, resulted from the purported ill-treatment (facts relative to individual

In December 2005 a Commission for the Execution of Sentences changed the applicant’s regime to the lighter “enhanced regime” which became called the “severe regime” with the adoption of the Execution of

case originated in applications against Ukraine lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various

case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various

His complaints concerning the material conditions and the regime of his internment, the neglect of the medical staff as well as concerning ill ‑ treatment at the hands of other residents of the

    The Court notes that the applicants, who suffer from various disabilities, were kept in detention in poor conditions which did not satisfy their special needs.

; from 13/01/2014 to 13/02/2014; IK ‑ 17   Krasnoyarsk Region; from 13/01/2012 to 13/01/2014 and from 13/02/2014 to 07/05/2015. 25/09/2020 28/07/2020 5,000     13141/15 18/02/2015

He noted that Mr Gedik complained of pain in various parts of the body and referred him to a forensic doctor for a final report.

;   IK-5 Krasnoyarsk Region The applicant is a detainee, his relatives are: wife, child, brother, sister Moscow Region 4,000       8336/21 15/01/2021 Mikhail Sergeyevich ZAKHARIN 1979

The court held that only the original decision to impose the regime of 8 September 2011 had been justified.