Türkiye 29/01/2021 Yakup DALKILIÇ 1973 Kocaeli Tolga YILDIRIM 70. 12234/21 Zengin c. Türkiye 15/02/2021 Yasin ZENGİN 1990 Elazığ Elif Süeda ÖZDEMİR 71. 12253/21 Argın c.

In others the authority to do so is vested in the public prosecutor (see Yildirim , cited above).

    La Cour estime que la détermination du régime juridique des relations du père et de son enfant putatif concerne sa «   vie privée   » du premier ( Yildirim c.

  Denmark (28 November 1984, Series A no. 87); Yildirim v. Austria ((dec.), no. 34308/96, 19 October 1999); Wulff v. Danmark ((dec.), no.   35016/07, 9 March 2010); and A.L. v.

width:18.86pt; display:inline-block } .s4D6B2E9B { width:184.1pt; display:inline-block } .sDEA786DA { width:210.67pt; display:inline-block }     FIRST SECTION     CASE OF SÜLEYMAN YILDIRIM

Turkey 11/04/2017 Fatih YILDIRIM 1979 Nilgün ARI Ordinary judge or public prosecutor HSYK decision 20. 81501/17 Dursun v.

vestiaire :, Me Cécile CABAILLOT, avocat au barreau de METZ, vestiaire : B 606 COMPOSITION DU TRIBUNAL: Présidente : Françoise ROSENAU Assesseur : Sébastien DORKEL, Juge-Consulaire Assesseur : Mésut YILDIRIM

Türkiye 05/07/2017 Mehmet ŞAHİN 13/09/1975 Furkan YILDIRIM 31. 60374/17 Akın v. Türkiye 10/07/2017 Mehmet AKIN 05/01/1985 Janset ATİLA 32. 60382/17 Dere v.

Türkiye 21/08/2019 Salih YILDIRIM 1981 Samsun Turkish Awarded 18. 47663/19 Kılıç v. Türkiye 21/08/2019 Ruhi KILIÇ 1986 Bingöl Turkish Awarded 19. 48028/19 Sarıbek v.

width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s85226119 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:10pt }     SECOND SECTION           CASE OF YILDIRIR

inline-block } .sAAF48370 { width:22.55pt; display:inline-block } .s4257C205 { width:238.15pt; display:inline-block }     DEUXIÈME SECTION           AFFAIRE DAĞABAKAN ET YILDIRIM

sA0AD8316 { width:13.82pt; display:inline-block } .s4664C02 { width:185.79pt; display:inline-block }       DEUXIÈME SECTION             AFFAIRE ABDULHADİ YILDIRIM

the order in issue involved a finding of guilt pursuant to a criminal charge; it therefore did not constitute a “penalty” within the meaning of Article 7 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis , Yildirim

Türkiye 24/12/2024 Barış YILDIRIM 1989 Istanbul Turkish   Failure/delay in examining requests for release/objection during post-conviction detention   2241/25 Çiftçi v.

law of existing family ties concerned the applicant's “family life” because, in any event, the determination of the father's legal relations with his putative child concerned his “private life” (see Yildirim

Türkiye 23/01/2017 Hüseyin YILDIRIM 15/09/1963 Ankara Erkam YILDIRIM 1,000,000 5,000 - - 74. 19634/17 Baydilli v.

30 août 1961 Diyarbakır Reyhan Yalçındağ Baydemir   46482/13 19   mars 2010 Ahmet BİRSİN 1 er janvier 1968 Diyarbakır Reyhan Yalçındağ Baydemir   46483/13 19   mars 2010 Nadir YILDIRIM

Türkiye 21/11/2022 Yahya YILDIRIM 1979 Ankara Turkish Ebubekir ÇAKIR   92. 55452/22 Şimşek v. Türkiye 22/11/2022 Ömer ŞİMŞEK 1982 Kayseri Turkish Hatice ŞİMŞEK 93. 55456/22 Tulukçu v.

Türkiye 25/12/2021 Fatma YILDIRIM 1980 Ankara Turkish Eyyüp SAĞIR 62. 2357/22 Polat v. Türkiye 04/01/2022 Halil POLAT 1981 Kayseri Turkish Metin POLAT 63. 2360/22 Özpınar v.

06/2007 Mehmet DUYAR 01/01/1952 Izmir İsmet BAŞER 01/01/1950 Izmir Fatma DUYAR 01/01/1955 Izmir Emine ONGAN 01/01/1943 Izmir Şerife ULUDAĞ 01/01/1947 Izmir Ülfet DUYAR 01/01/1915 Izmir Ahmet Hamdi YILDIRIM