Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”);   Recalling that in these judgments the Court found procedural violations of Article 2 of the Convention due to various shortcomings in the

Arrêt 27.3.2018 [Section III] Article 46 Article 46-2 Exécution de l'arrêt Mesures individuelles Mesures générales Comité des Ministres tenu de définir les mesures devant être prises par la Russie concernant

L.7112-5, 1° du code du travail, sous réserve de l'expiration d'un préavis d'un mois, conformément aux dispositions de l'article 46 de la convention collective nationale des Journalistes professionnels

la Cour européenne des Droits de l’Homme rendu le 16 septembre 1999 dans l’affaire Buscemi contre l’Italie et transmis à la même date au Comité des Ministres en vertu de l’article 46 de la Convention

judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Kiefer case delivered on 28 March 2000 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Branquinho Luís case delivered on 4 October 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that the case

Court of Human Rights in the Hababou case delivered on 26 April 2001 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;   Recalling that the case originated

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Santelli case delivered on 27 February 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that the case originated

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Burgorgue case delivered on 5 December 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that the case originated

final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Bódiné Bencze case delivered on 1 October 2002 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;

final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Beck case delivered on 9   January 2001 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; &

final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Jakola case delivered on 6   March 2001 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; &

Court of Human Rights in the Toimi case delivered on 22   March 2005 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;   Recalling that the case

judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Löffler case delivered on 3 October 2000 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Bánošová case delivered on 19 April 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that the case originated

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Polat Yüksel case delivered on 5 December 2000 and transmitted on the same date to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Can case delivered on 5 December 2000 and transmitted on the same date to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that the

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Özçetin case delivered on 5 December 2000 and transmitted on the same date to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Gawracz case delivered on 12 February 2002 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that the