CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0712JUD003649805
12 juillet 2011
Finland, The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Nicolas Bratza, President, Lech Garlicki, Ljiljana Mijović, Päivi Hirvelä,
Page 19 sur 283
1ère CHAMBRE CIVILE
670e05e110ea465c0ffcf796
14 octobre 2024
suivant déclaration d'appel du 19 janvier 2024 APPELANT : [S] [C] [K] né le [Date naissance 3] 1953 à [Localité 8] de nationalité Française demeurant [Adresse 4] Représenté par Maître Nicolas
cr
6137261acd58014677422f5a
1 septembre 2004
Nicolas, contre l'arrêt de cour d'appel de ROUEN, chambre correctionnelle, en date du 29 octobre 2003, qui, pour recel, les a condamnés respectivement à un an et six mois d'emprisonnement avec sursis
61372634cd58014677423c12
13 mars 2002
Nicole, épouse Y..., contre l'arrêt de la cour d'appel d'ORLEANS, chambre correctionnelle, en date du 3 juillet 2001, qui, pour usage d'attestations faisant état de faits matériellement inexacts, l'a
PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2818564-3085473
2 septembre 2009
They rely on Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life), Article 14 (prohibition of discrimination) and Article 1 of Protocol No.
ECLI:CEDH:003-1581094-1655138
7 février 2006
Relying on Article 13 (right to an effective remedy), she also submits that she did not have an effective remedy in respect of these infringements of her right to respect for her private life.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68265-68733
12 mai 2000
His appeal against his conviction was dismissed on the ground that the invasion of his privacy was outweighed by the aim of proving he had been involved in serious crime.
ECLI:CEDH:003-2728223-2981727
12 mai 2009
The Lords were further doubtful whether an ordinary superficial search of the person could be said to show a lack of respect for private life, so as to bring Article 8 into operation.
ECLI:CEDH:003-2761236-3021509
9 juin 2009
The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life) of the European Convention on Human Rights, on account of the interception
1ère / 6ème SSR
CETAT:CETATEXT000026916457
7 janvier 2013
A...,, et à la SCP Nicolaÿ, de Lanouvelle, Hannotin, avocat de la communauté d'agglomération de Toulon-Provence-Méditérranée ; 1.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0410DEC001847205
10 avril 2012
The applicants and the applicant companies, referred to in the annex table, are Moldovan nationals or private companies registered in Moldova, except Partidul Popular Republican, which is
civ1
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2009:C100027
14 janvier 2009
divorce avait été formulée pour la première fois, la cour d'appel n'a pas mis la Cour de cassation en mesure d'exercer son contrôle sur la loi applicable à la demande de prestation compensatoire et a privé
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:003-1881420-1975886
19 décembre 2006
La Cour ne peut suivre les juridictions internes qui ont estimé que la conversation téléphonique revêtait un caractère privé et ne pouvait dès lors être diffusée.
ECLI:CEDH:003-521026-522463
19 mars 2002
Composition of the Court The case will be heard by a Chamber composed as follows: Matti Pellonpää (Finnish), President , Nicolas Bratza (British), Elisabeth Palm (Swedish), Jerzy Makarczyk
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-781624-798129
1 juillet 2003
In 1995 N. applied for an adjustment of the debt under the 1993 Act on the Adjustment of the Debts of Private Individuals and proposed a repayment schedule for the court’s approval.
ECLI:CEDH:003-653266-659031
19 novembre 2002
She relies, lastly, on Articles 8 (right to respect for private and family life) and 10 (freedom of expression).
ECLI:CEDH:003-1963357-2064394
28 mars 2007
Summary of the facts The applicant submitted that in late 1998 and early 1999 he had been approached by AZ, a person previously unknown to him, through VS, a private acquaintance.
ECLI:CEDH:003-1459759-1525536
27 septembre 2005
Composition of the Court The case will be heard by a Chamber composed as follows: Josep Casadevall (Andorran), President , Nicolas Bratza (British), Matti Pellonpää (Finnish), Rait
ECLI:CEDH:003-2264727-2415407
6 février 2008
Complaint The applicant complains about the residence prohibition against him, relying on Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life) of the European Convention on Human Rights
ECLI:CEDH:003-1951993-2051190
14 mars 2007
It held that the refusal to grant the applicant authorisation had not been based on her choice of lifestyle and had not therefore given rise to a breach of Articles 8 (right to respect for private and