CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

1 577 résultats pour « Policella »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0708DEC001350807

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2008

8 juillet 2008

Moreover, he refuted the Swedish Security Police’s allegations that he was a security threat to Sweden as groundless. 11.

Source officielle

Page 19 sur 79

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0624JUD005002708

Admin. suprême

24 juin 2014

24 juin 2014

    In a judgment of 18 February 2008 the Burgas Administrative Court found the disputed detention order lawful, noting that the police’s explanations showed that there had been a reasonable

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0404DEC001718504

Admin. suprême

4 avril 2006

4 avril 2006

In 1989 he was involved in the resistance against the Israeli occupation and sentenced to 99 years’ imprisonment for having purportedly killed a policeman.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2719119-2980272

Admin. suprême

7 mai 2009

7 mai 2009

Caught up in the incident, the applicant alleges that a policeman hit him in the face with a truncheon; he lost several teeth.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0524DEC003129311

Admin. suprême

24 mai 2018

24 mai 2018

domestic judgment (appeal court, date)     31293/11 19/08/2011 Aleksandr Igorevich Lazarev 26/03/1967     15/01/2010 Marijuana Anonymous/unverified tip, repeated calls, undercover policeman

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0406DEC001682402

Admin. suprême

6 avril 2006

6 avril 2006

des agents du Bureau de lutte contre la criminalité organisée et la corruption ( Organizētās noziedzības un korupcijas apkarošanas birojs , ci-après l’ ONKAB ), relevant de la Police d’État ( Valsts policija

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-154434

Admin. suprême

16 avril 2015

16 avril 2015

    On 19   July   2013 the Internal Security Office of the State Police ( Valsts policijas Iekšējās drošības birojs ) dismissed the applicant’s complaint.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-146440

Admin. suprême

29 août 2014

29 août 2014

However, since the two men had worn plain clothes and neither they nor their car had had any police signs, the applicant and her friend had not initially realised that officer K. was a policeman and his

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-144675

Admin. suprême

15 mai 2014

15 mai 2014

However, since the two men had worn plain clothes and neither they nor their car had had any police signs, the applicant and her friend had not initially realised that officer K. was a policeman and his

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0710DEC001127484

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 1989

10 juillet 1989

  The applicant was heard as well as the policeman named by the applicant.   The Court, however, did not obtain the official weather reports.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0419DEC007679513

Admin. suprême

19 avril 2016

19 avril 2016

The articles claimed that, inter alia, a policeman (a title presumably traceable to the applicant) was fraudulently obtaining benefits from the State, including the use of a State apartment, despite it

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0704JUD003946813

Admin. suprême

4 juillet 2017

4 juillet 2017

He said that at the material time he had been serving as a Croatian policeman in Karlovac.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1113JUD002438312

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2014

13 novembre 2014

From the police’s description of the facts and evidence it appears that on 13   March   2010 at 9:45 am while trying to overtake X’s car, which had been improperly parked, the applicant failed

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-144663

Admin. suprême

12 mai 2014

12 mai 2014

It noted that the applicant had climbed on a cupboard measuring 1.90 metres and had failed to descend on the police’s request.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0116DEC005134699

Admin. suprême

16 janvier 2001

16 janvier 2001

She had been invited to leave French territory within one month after receipt of notification of the Commissioner of Police’s decision.

Source officielle
CA

Sociale D salle 3

63a402863f67e905df3d2922

Appel

21 octobre 2022

21 octobre 2022

représentée par Me Dominique GUERIN, avocat au barreau de LILLE substitué par Me Judith OZUCH, avocat au barreau de LILLE INTIMÉE : Mme [O] [I] [Adresse 1] [Localité 3] représentée par Me Anne POLICELLA

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0315DEC008109712

Admin. suprême

15 mars 2016

15 mars 2016

He did so at the police’s request so that the circumstances of the case be clarified.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0504JUD002738020

Admin. suprême

4 mai 2023

4 mai 2023

    There is no indication that the applicant failed to inform the Court of any essential facts relating specifically to the proceedings concerning the police’s refusal to disclose to him his

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0312JUD006187608

Admin. suprême

12 mars 2015

12 mars 2015

    The applicant objected to the police’s proposal, submitting, inter alia, that charges should be pressed against M., implicated by late D. in her son’s beating. 26.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0129DEC000116121

Admin. suprême

29 janvier 2026

29 janvier 2026

In response to D.K.’s arguments, it held that the surveillance had been (i) duly justified by the Slovak police’s request, (ii) lawfully authorised by the municipal prosecutor’s decision of 9 November

Source officielle