CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0708DEC001350807
8 juillet 2008
Moreover, he refuted the Swedish Security Police’s allegations that he was a security threat to Sweden as groundless. 11.
Page 19 sur 79
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0624JUD005002708
24 juin 2014
In a judgment of 18 February 2008 the Burgas Administrative Court found the disputed detention order lawful, noting that the police’s explanations showed that there had been a reasonable
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0404DEC001718504
4 avril 2006
In 1989 he was involved in the resistance against the Israeli occupation and sentenced to 99 years’ imprisonment for having purportedly killed a policeman.
PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2719119-2980272
7 mai 2009
Caught up in the incident, the applicant alleges that a policeman hit him in the face with a truncheon; he lost several teeth.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0524DEC003129311
24 mai 2018
domestic judgment (appeal court, date) 31293/11 19/08/2011 Aleksandr Igorevich Lazarev 26/03/1967 15/01/2010 Marijuana Anonymous/unverified tip, repeated calls, undercover policeman
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0406DEC001682402
6 avril 2006
des agents du Bureau de lutte contre la criminalité organisée et la corruption ( Organizētās noziedzības un korupcijas apkarošanas birojs , ci-après l’ ONKAB ), relevant de la Police d’État ( Valsts policija
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-154434
16 avril 2015
On 19 July 2013 the Internal Security Office of the State Police ( Valsts policijas Iekšējās drošības birojs ) dismissed the applicant’s complaint.
ECLI:CEDH:001-146440
29 août 2014
However, since the two men had worn plain clothes and neither they nor their car had had any police signs, the applicant and her friend had not initially realised that officer K. was a policeman and his
ECLI:CEDH:001-144675
15 mai 2014
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0710DEC001127484
10 juillet 1989
The applicant was heard as well as the policeman named by the applicant. The Court, however, did not obtain the official weather reports.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0419DEC007679513
19 avril 2016
The articles claimed that, inter alia, a policeman (a title presumably traceable to the applicant) was fraudulently obtaining benefits from the State, including the use of a State apartment, despite it
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0704JUD003946813
4 juillet 2017
He said that at the material time he had been serving as a Croatian policeman in Karlovac.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1113JUD002438312
13 novembre 2014
From the police’s description of the facts and evidence it appears that on 13 March 2010 at 9:45 am while trying to overtake X’s car, which had been improperly parked, the applicant failed
ECLI:CEDH:001-144663
12 mai 2014
It noted that the applicant had climbed on a cupboard measuring 1.90 metres and had failed to descend on the police’s request.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0116DEC005134699
16 janvier 2001
She had been invited to leave French territory within one month after receipt of notification of the Commissioner of Police’s decision.
Sociale D salle 3
63a402863f67e905df3d2922
21 octobre 2022
représentée par Me Dominique GUERIN, avocat au barreau de LILLE substitué par Me Judith OZUCH, avocat au barreau de LILLE INTIMÉE : Mme [O] [I] [Adresse 1] [Localité 3] représentée par Me Anne POLICELLA
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0315DEC008109712
15 mars 2016
He did so at the police’s request so that the circumstances of the case be clarified.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0504JUD002738020
4 mai 2023
There is no indication that the applicant failed to inform the Court of any essential facts relating specifically to the proceedings concerning the police’s refusal to disclose to him his
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0312JUD006187608
12 mars 2015
The applicant objected to the police’s proposal, submitting, inter alia, that charges should be pressed against M., implicated by late D. in her son’s beating. 26.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0129DEC000116121
29 janvier 2026
In response to D.K.’s arguments, it held that the surveillance had been (i) duly justified by the Slovak police’s request, (ii) lawfully authorised by the municipal prosecutor’s decision of 9 November