Dans la procédure devant la Commission, la requérante est représentée par Maîtres Naciye Kaplan, Filiz Köstek, avocats au barreau d'istanbul, et Maître Bedia Buran, avocat

  Hakkı Oğulcan ÖZÇELİK 05/10/1990 Ankara   Gökçal Çetin EKŞİOĞLU             50620/11 23/03/2011 Şevket ERTÜRK 12/09/1938 Kocaeli   Saide

       Dans la procédure devant la Commission, la requérante est représentée par Maîtres Naciye Kaplan, Filiz Köstek, avocats au barreau d'istanbul, et Maître Bedia Buran, avocat

Invoquant les articles 6 § 1 (droit à un procès équitable) et 10 (liberté d’expression), il se plaint notamment de perquisitions et de saisies opérées à son domicile et sur son lieu de travail.

       Dans la procédure devant la Commission, le requérant est représenté par Maîtres Naciye Kaplan, Bedia Buran et Filiz Kostak, avocates au barreau d'istanbul.

Il est représenté devant la Cour par M e Naciye Kaplan, avocate au barreau d’Istanbul. A.

In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on it, from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal

He is represented before the Commission by Messrs Naciye Kaplan, Bedia Buran and Filiz Kostak, lawyers practising in Istanbul.

Türkiye 14/02/2022 Sait ÖZER 1985 Kayseri Turkish Ahmet ÖZER 6. 9906/22 Ekmen v. Türkiye 09/02/2022 Ali EKMEN 1972 Istanbul Turkish Lezgin Ahmet BAYBAŞİN 7. 10048/22 Tekin v.

The applicant said to the commander that in case the security forces wanted to conduct a search in his house they could go in.

The chief of staff made a statement and said that they had received information from outside [about the event in Uludere] ...

In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on it, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the

born 1947, resident in Norfold, United Kingdom, British and Cypriot national;   49307/08   Esat Mustafa, born 1953, resident in Enfield, United Kingdom, British and Cypriot national;   Nafia

    The applicants were represented before the Court by Ms Naciye Kaplan, Ms Filiz Köstak and Ms Bedia Buran lawyers practising in Istanbul.

    He is represented before the Court by Mrs Naciye Kaplan, a lawyer practising in Istanbul.   A.

Türkiye 15/12/2022 Yusuf Alp KAYA 1988 Ankara Turkish Tarık Said GÜLDİBİ Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   3001/23 Bulat v.

Türkiye 19/10/2020 Ali KURT 1973 Sivas Turkish Tarık Said GÜLDİBİ 136. 48952/20 Emeç v. Türkiye 28/08/2020 Hüseyin EMEÇ 1988 Hatay Turkish   137. 48982/20 Kanak v.

Türkiye 03/01/2022 Ahmet ŞAHİN 1962 Antalya Turkish Mehmet Sait ŞAHİN 10. 3865/22 Çağan v. Türkiye 06/01/2022 Erdem ÇAĞAN 1980 İzmir Turkish Özlem SUZAN 11. 3918/22 Göl v.

Türkiye 13/04/2021 Mehmet Sait ATEŞ 1982 Diyarbakır Turkish Lezgin Ahmet BAYBAŞİN   21686/21 Akbulut v.

Asliye Hukuk , E:2006/912, K: 2009/234)   17027/10 10/03/2010 Hasan SEVİM 05/09/1954 Basel (Switzerland)       Faruk Nafiz ERTEKİN Court of Cassation (Yargıtay 9.