B A, représenté par Me Smirnova, demande au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler l'arrêté du 8 novembre 2024 par lequel le préfet de police lui a refusé la délivrance d'un titre de séjour, lui a fait obligation

inline-block } .s330D47D5 { width:214.44pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block }     THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 50228/06 Anna Vladimirovna SMIRNOVA

Mr Anatoliy Sergeyevich Tsvetkov and Mr Ilya Igorevich Smirnov were born in 1959 and 1982 respectively and live in Velikiye Luki of the Pskov Region.

  Russie , n o   33761/05, §§   124 ‑ 127, 5   juin 2014, et Andrey Smirnov c. Russie , n o   3149/10, §§   35 ‑ 38, 13   février 2018)   ?

    Le droit et la pratique internes pertinents Pour le résumé des dispositions pertinentes, il convient de se référer à l’arrêt Sergey Smirnov c.

In particular: - Is the applicant’s application lodged with the Court substantially the same as a matter that has already been submitted to the United Nations Human Rights Committee (“HRC”) (see Smirnova

display:inline-block } .s64406319 { width:11.68pt; display:inline-block } .s2753FA3F { width:163.53pt; display:inline-block }   FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 20316/13 Sergiy Volodymyrovych SMIRNOV

avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic }   Communicated on 30 August 2016   THIRD SECTION Application no. 34381/16 Roman Viktorovich SMIRNOV

Moreover, an internal passport was required for more crucial needs, such as finding employment or receiving medical care (as established in Smirnova v.

Switzerland (no. 2) [GC], no. 32772/02, §   63, ECHR 2009, and, mutatis mutandis, Smirnova and Smirnova v. Russia (dec.), nos.

Switzerland (no. 2) [GC], no. 32772/02, §   63, ECHR 2009 and, mutatis mutandis , Smirnova and Smirnova v.

width:196.1pt; display:inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 22442/05 by Tamara SMIRNOVA

inline-block } .sF2E32F9B { width:36.61pt; display:inline-block } .s5F32E900 { width:208.31pt; display:inline-block }       FIRST SECTION         CASE OF LYUDMILA SMIRNOVA

:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }     FIFTH SECTION Application no. 1870/05 Irina Trofimovna SMIRNOVA

Russie (n° 21851/03) Sergey Smirnov c.

stated their readiness to pay the following amounts to the applicants as just satisfaction: 4,090   euros   (EUR) to Mr Demchishin, EUR 8,450 to Mr Mamatkulov, EUR   4,740 to Mr   Smirnov

provisoire subie par le requérant était-elle compatible avec la condition de jugement dans un délai «   raisonnable   », au sens de l’article 5 § 3 de la Convention (voir, entre autres, Smirnova

width:162.97pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block } .sB62BA9AD { width:168.28pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 9362/08 Vladimir Vasilyevich SMIRNOV

margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt }       Communicated on 22 February 2018   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 20316/13 Sergiy Volodymyrovych SMIRNOV

. ; -les observations de Me Smirnova, avocate commise d’office, représentant M.