Le Gouvernement rappelle que dans l’arrêt Kroon et autres c.

inline-block } .s5E21BD4C { width:191.88pt; display:inline-block } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } FIRST SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 42429/98 by   KRONE

It was headlined “Detectives and burglaries intensify the Krone conflict” ( “Detektive und Einbrüche verstärken “Krone”-Konflikt” ). The relevant parts read as follows: “...

On 6 March 1997 the High Court upheld their conviction and sentenced them to 20 day-fines of 400 Danish kroner (DKK) (approximately 53 euros (EUR)) and ordered them to pay DKK   75,000 (approximately

Slovakia , no. 30255/09, 28 January 2014; Berger-Krall and Others v.   Slovenia , no. 14717/04, 12 June 2014; Statileo v. Croatia , no. 12027/10, 10 July 2014; Anthony Aquilina v.

It ordered the first applicant to pay 25,000 Norwegian kroner (NOK) in non-pecuniary damage to Mr Bratholm (the latter’s claim for non-pecuniary damage against the second applicant had been submitted out

However, by a judgment of 3 April 2003, the Supreme Court quashed the lower courts’ judgments and fined the Tallinn City Government 50,000 kroons (EEK) (approximately 3,200   euros (EUR)).

  In 1986 they bought property in Stryn for 1 Norwegian kroner (NOK) and borrowed NOK   2.8 million from the Bergen Bank to renovate it.

In addition the proceeds, estimated at 40,000 Danish Kroner (DKK), were confiscated, as were various copies of designer goods, such as lamps and cutlery.

7], - par contrat en date du 17 octobre 2014, un camion benne de marque MAN, immatriculé [Immatriculation 3], - par contrat dont l'exemplaire produit n'est ni daté, ni signé, un plateau de marque KRONE

Février 1949 à [Localité 8] (BOUCHES DU RHONE) [Adresse 3] [Localité 1] Représentée par Me Eric DEZ, avocat au barreau de l'AIN, avocat postulant, Et ayant pour avocat plaidant l'ASSOCIATION KROELL

Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Kroon and Others v. the Netherlands , 27 October 1994

a judgment of 18 December 1996, it concluded that the first two articles, but not the third, were defamatory and ordered the applicants, jointly and severally, to pay to Interfil 350,000 Norwegian kroner

GmbH & Co KG, a limited partnership registered under Austrian law, and Krone-Verlag GmbH, a limited company registered under Austrian law. 2.

xa0;       Application No. 11704/85                       by Eva KROL

  Krone Verlags GmbH c. Autriche (n o 72331/01) Non-violation de l’article 10 La requérante, Krone Verlags GmbH & Co KG, est une société à responsabilité limitée ayant son siège à Vienne.

Poland (no. 64249/01)     Thursday 9 November 2006   Krone Verlags GmbH & Co KG v.

the friendly settlement I can inform you that my         client Frede Schmidt is willing to accept the amount of         Danish kroner

declaration, and submitted it to the Court:   “I, Mr Jørgen Steen Sørensen, Agent of the Government of Denmark, declare that the Government of Denmark offer to pay ex gratia 135,000 Danish   kroner

    Relevant domestic law The historical and legal background concerning specially protected tenancy was explained by the Court in Berger-Krall and Others v. Slovenia , no.