Conclusion   : irrecevable (incompatible ratione materiae ). (Voir aussi Beeler c.

Inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae

Conclusion : inadmissible (incompatible ratione personae ). (See also Lambert and Others v. France [GC], 46043/14, 5 June 2015, Legal Summary ; Chiragov and Others v.

Pour cette même raison, un tel recours n’entrait pas non plus en ligne de compte aux fins de l’épuisement des voies de recours internes.

Conclusion : inadmissible (incompatible ratione materiae ). (See Denisov v. Ukraine [GC], 76639/11, 25 September 2018, Information Note 221 ; Medžlis Islamske Zajednice Brčko and Others v.

    The Government argued that the application should be considered incompatible ratione materiae with the Convention.

Inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae

    The Government added that the applicant’s complaint was also incompatible ratione materiae with Article 10 of the Convention for another reason.

Des déclarations générales quant aux raisons pour lesquelles les autorités devraient mettre à disposition certains types d’informations dont elles disposent ne suffisent pas à faire entrer en jeu l’article

Conclusion: inadmissible (incompatible ratione materiae ). Article 8: There was no indication that any “private life” issue had been the reason for the termination of the applicants’ terms of office.

Conclusion   : irrecevable (incompatible ratione personae ). (Voir aussi Lambert et autres c. France   [GC], 46043/14, 5 juin 2015, Résumé juridique   ; Chiragov et autres c.

Conclusion   : irrecevable (incompatible ratione materiae ). (Voir aussi Demir et Baykara c.   Turquie [GC], 34503/97, 12   novembre 2008, Résumé juridique   ; Barış et autres c.

Conclusion : inadmissible (incompatible ratione materiae ). (See also Vallianatos and Others v.   Greece [GC], 29381/09 and 32684/09, 7   November 2013, Legal Summary ; Roj TV A/S v.

Inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae

The application must therefore be rejected as incompatible ratione materiae with the provisions of the Convention pursuant to Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention.

    It follows that the applicant party’s complaints are incompatible ratione materiae with the provisions of the Convention and its Protocols, within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a), and must

    It follows that the application is incompatible ratione personae with the provisions of the Convention within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) and must be rejected, pursuant to Article 35

    The Government submitted that the complaint was incompatible ratione materiae with the provisions of the Convention and its Protocols since the independence referendum did not fall within

    The Government submitted that the application should be declared inadmissible ratione materiae since, in their view, the right to beg did not as such fall within the ambit of Article 8.