An eyewitness claimed that, because his grandson – a young boy – had been in the area where the shooting occurred, he had asked Major G. for permission to approach and remove him from danger.

Mari and their replies to judges' questions. I.     RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW AND PRACTICE A.     Expedited possession of land 16.

Magomed had been in t-shirt, jeans, flip ‑ flops and a cap, his friends had had similar outfits. None of them had been armed.

On 15 March a panel of judges, with Z.R. acting as the presiding judge, opened a trial in the applicant’s case.

Before the Chamber, however, she claimed 1,525.45 lati (LVL) (approximately 2,300 euros (EUR)) under that head.

He admitted having had sex with the applicant and promised to marry her after she graduated from school.

On 24 March 1992, as no appeal had been lodged, the case became final. B.     Proceedings before the Civil Court in its ordinary jurisdiction 15.

    The applicant was represented by Mr Bertil Bjernstam, a Bachelor of Laws from Gothenburg, and by Mr Clarence Crafoord and Ms Anna Rogalska Hedlund, lawyers practising in Stockholm.

The request was rejected by the Supreme Soviet of the USSR on 23 March.

  Pursuant to the order made in consequence, the Registrar received the applicant’s memorial on 11 March 1996 and the Government’s memorial on 29 March 1996.

The incident was recorded by the police, who also noted the presence of Jean-Marie Le Pen, then Chairman of the Front National party, who was watching the show from a wing, separated from the rest of the

The investigation into that case had begun on 28   March 2003.

They pointed out that same-sex marriage was still prohibited in France, as indicated by the Court of Cassation in a judgment of 13 March 2007.

   On 28 March 1985 the administrative court delivered the following interlocutory judgment:   "...

    A further hearing was held in private on 24 March 2000, at which the applicant and his two lawyers were present.

On 3   November 2011 Jean-Paul Costa’s term as judge and President of the Court came to an end.

France, The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   András Baka, President ,   Jean-Paul Costa,   Rıza Türmen,   Karel Jungwiert,  

On 21 October 2008 it was declared admissible by a Chamber of that Section composed of the following judges: Rait Maruste, President , Jean-Paul Costa, Karel Jungwiert, Renate Jaeger, Mark Villiger, Isabelle

The Government denied that Article 8 (art. 8) was applicable and, in the alternative, claimed that there had been no violation. A. The existence of "family life" 33.