Arrêt König du 28 juin 1978, série A n° 27, p. 37, par. 106 ;   Arrêt Feldbrugge du 25 mai 1986, série A n° 99 ;   Arrêt Deumeland du 25 mai 1986, série A n° 100, p. 24, par. 71 ; &#xa0

  D.H., arrêt König du 28 juin 1978, série A n° 27, p. 34, par. 99 ; arrêt Buchholz du 6 mai 1981, série A n° 42, pp. 15-16, par. 49 ; arrêt Guincho du 10 juillet 1984, série A n° 81, avis de la Commission

Germany , no. 23959/94, §   40, 20   December 2001, and König v. Germany , judgment of 28 June 1978, Series A no. 27, §   98).

Nonetheless, the case-law provides a number of guidelines on the subject (see, among other authorities, König v.   Germany (Article 50), judgment of 10 March 1980, Series A no. 36, pp.

    The Court finds that compensation for costs incurred in the domestic proceedings may only be granted insofar as they were necessary in trying to prevent the violation found (König v.

the agricultural authorities was necessary for the transfer of the grazing and hut rights, as it was at that moment that a “dispute” arose within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see König

In such cases, the relevant period starts running as soon as a “dispute” arises (see, among other authorities, König v. Germany , judgment of 28 June 1978, Series A no.

Austria judgment of 16 July 1971, Series A no. 13, p. 39, para. 94, and the König v. Germany judgment of 28 June 1978, Series A no. 27, p. 30, para. 90). 3. Conclusion 41.

While the applicant was entitled to make use of his procedural rights, any consequential lengthening of proceedings cannot be held against the State (see, among other authorities, König v.

in favour of the view that there had been a violation of Article 8 of the Convention for the reasons set out in the judgment, which strengthen the Court’s settled case-law since the judgments in the König

Greece , 9   December 1994, § 39, Series A no. 301 ‑ B; König v. Germany , 28 June 1978, §§ 89-90, Series A no. 27; Ferrazzini v.

proceedings may only be instituted after a determination of the same dispute by another authority the concept of “reasonable time” must be applied so as to include both sets of proceedings (cf. e.g. the König

  Nevertheless, it has not been shown that the possibility of preparing copies of the case-file was considered in order to avoid delays in the conduct of the proceedings (see Eur Court H.R., König

practise a profession is at stake give rise to "contestations (disputes) over civil rights" within the meaning of Article 6 para. 1 (art. 6-1) (see, among other authorities, the following judgments: König

This decision must however be proportionate having regard to the special circumstances of the case (see König v. Germany , cited above, §   110; Boddaert v.

the Court will examine the features of the right or duty at issue to determine whether the character of the right or duty is in substance predominantly a “public” or “private” one (see, for example, König

Accordingly, in ascertaining whether the present case concerned the determination of a civil right, only the character of the right at issue is of relevance (see König v.

Moreover, compensation for costs incurred in the domestic proceedings may only be granted in so far as they were necessary in trying to prevent the violation found (see König v.

proceedings in which the right to continue to exercise a profession is at stake give rise to disputes (“contestations”) over civil rights within the meaning of Article   6 §   1 (see, inter alia , König

Germany , no. 23959/94, § 40, 20   December 2001, and König v. Germany , judgment of 28   June   1978, Series A no. 27, § 98).