du troisième enfant, le congé de maternité de la salariée était de 16 semaines avec traitement entier et qu'aux termes de l'article 46 de la même Convention, l'employée qui élevait elle-même son enfant

de la Cour européenne des Droits de l'Homme rendu le 25 mars 1999 dans l'affaire Musiał et transmis à la même date au Comité des Ministres en vertu de l'article 46 de la Convention ; Rappelant qu'à l'origine

de la Cour européenne des Droits de l’Homme rendu le 6 février 2001 dans l’affaire Beer   Gertrude et transmis à la même date au Comité des Ministres en vertu de l’article 46 de la Convention  

définitif de la Cour européenne des Droits de l’Homme rendu le 29 mars 2001 dans l’affaire D.N. et transmis à la même date au Comité des Ministres en vertu de l’article 46 de la Convention   ; &#

III case delivered on 2 November 1999 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that the case originated in an application (No. 37188/97)

final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Satık case delivered on 25 September 2003 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;  

final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Karatay case delivered on 28 October 2003 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;  

of the European Court of Human Rights in the I.M. case delivered on 4 October 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers the same day under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that the case

of the European Court of Human Rights in the K.K.C. case delivered on 21 December 2001 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that the

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Siebenhandl case delivered on 12 June 2001 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers the same day under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Arbore case delivered on 25 May 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become final under Articles 44 and 46 of the Convention; Recalling

of the European Court of Human Rights in the C. case delivered on 5   April 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers on the same date under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Grosse case delivered on 8 June 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers on the same date under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that the

final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Varga case delivered on 22 November 2002 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;  

Court of Human Rights in the Alpay case delivered on 27 February 2001 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;   Recalling that the case originated

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Di Antonio case delivered on 28 April 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become final under Articles 44 and 46 of the Convention

of Ministers concerning the application of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention;   Having satisfied itself that on 5 August 2002 the government of the respondent state had paid the applicant

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Bruny case delivered on 30 May 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers on the same date under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that the case

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Ghezzi case delivered on 8 February 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become final under Articles 44 and 46 of the Convention;