It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications

Application no. 47022/14 Alin Daniel IUGA against Romania and 11 other applications (see list appended) The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 2   June   2016 as a Committee

It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications

It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications

It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications

It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications

.sB343B0AA { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 } FOURTH SECTION DECISION Applications nos. 5941/20 and 13384/20 Liam Handley NEELY against Portugal and Vitor Daniel

vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 53457/22 György BENEDEK against Hungary and 9 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights

Arial; font-size:8pt }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 1203/17 Lőrinc CSORDÁS and others against Hungary and 7 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights

It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications

It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications

vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 35415/23 Julianna NÉMETH against Hungary and 9 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights

vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 3307/24 Tibor Mihály TÓTH against Hungary and 9 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights

vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 48641/22 Henrik RAFFAEL against Hungary and 9 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights

; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 1397/23 Zoltán CSÁKI against Hungary and 11 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights

It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications

STANCIU against Romania and 8 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 1   June   2023 as a Committee composed of:   Tim Eicke

SLĂVOIU against Romania and 10 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 3   December 2020 as a Committee composed of:  

vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 14449/22 Ivett GYURCSÁNYI against Hungary and 9 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights

vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 1628/25 István GALLAI against Hungary and 9 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights