Did the applicant have effective remedies for his complaint about a potential risk to his life or health in case of removal, as required by Article 13 of the Convention?

    On 16 March 1993 the investigating judge asked a Dr Lavault to produce an additional expert report to verify whether the burns found on the victim’s body had been caused before death.

    On 7 March 2001 the applicant again complained of the alleged nuisance caused by the company. A new inspection of the site was carried out on 14 March 2001.

The applicant requested that N. and K., who had carried out the expert assessment in the case in 2000, be examined by a trial court.

12 March and 4   April 2018).

2021 communicated on 31 March 2025   SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the applicant’s allegations of ill-treatment during her arrest and police custody.

2025   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 54764/18 Vladimir OULIANOV against the Republic of Moldova lodged on 11 November 2018 communicated on 10 March 2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application

On the same day the investigating judge requested that further investigations be carried out as regards the applicant's case.

On 7 April 2003, following legislative amendments concerning the status of police officers, the case was referred to the prosecution service at the Bucharest County Court, which discontinued it on 2 March

A preliminary case assessment was carried out by a detective chief inspector, who audited all known information and documentation.

frères SA (la société Castel) a été condamnée à payer à M.

The March 1994 decision would be seen as part of the history of the case but, of itself, it would be of no weight at all for the Parole Board in July 1994.

The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

No. 172 March 2014 Dilipak and Karakaya v.

The circumstances of the case 2.     The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 3.

On 11 February and 8 March 2002, at the applicant’s request, the bailiff carried out new seizures, informing both the company and the enforcing court. 14.

  In the case of Petrova v.

CIV. 2 CGA COUR DE CASSATION ______________________ Audience publique du 9 mars 2017 Rejet Mme X..., président Arrêt n° 333 F-P+B Pourvoi n° B 16-12.209 R É P U B L I Q U E F R A N Ç A

A hearing was held on 24 March 1999.