CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0921JUD001235086
21 septembre 1993
Le 19 avril, le Gouvernement a fait parvenir ses observations sur ce document et sur les prétentions de l’intéressé au titre de l’article 50 (art. 50) de la Convention. EN FAIT I.
Page 23 sur 24
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0522JUD002196193
22 mai 1998
De fait, le suspect était le gérant de S. et S.N.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0128JUD006548010
28 janvier 2016
THE FACTS I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5. The applicant party was founded in 2007 and is based in Aurich.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1217JUD004901799
17 décembre 2004
Wilhjelm , M me M. Eckhardt, conseillers , M. J. Pedersen, requérant . La Cour a entendu en leurs déclarations M. Trier et M. Taksøe-Jensen. EN FAIT I.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0713JUD003803302
13 juillet 2006
THE FACTS I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 4. The applicants are German nationals and live in Hamminkeln. 5. They are owners of a real estate in Hamminkeln.
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0405REP002064192
5 avril 1995
ESTABLISHMENT OF THE FACTS A. The particular circumstances of the case 16.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0222JUD002603608
22 février 2011
1797/2008 (Thomas Wilhelmus Henricus Mennen v. The Netherlands).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0514JUD003454997
14 mai 2002
THE FACTS I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 10.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0412JUD004354708
12 avril 2012
Wilhelm, a lawyer practising in Dresden, and by Mr K. Amelung, Mr S. Breitenmoser and Mr J.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1025JUD006872516
25 octobre 2022
THE FACTS 2. The applicants were born in 1981, 1973 and 1968 respectively and are currently serving life sentences in the Central Prison of Nicosia.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:1011REP001889291
11 octobre 1994
ESTABLISHMENT OF THE FACTS (paras. 18-35) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 A.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0520JUD002125793
20 mai 1998
AS TO THE FACTS I. the CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 7.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1126JUD000369010
26 novembre 2015
Even if one were to assume that the leaflet did not contain a wrong statement of facts, the applicant’s freedom of expression had to cede.
In actual fact the suspect was the managing director of S. and S.N.
AS TO THE FACTS I. THE PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE A. The institution of the criminal proceedings against the applicant 8.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0909REP001391488
9 septembre 1992
ESTABLISHMENT OF THE FACTS (paras. 28 - 47). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 A.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0527DEC005474913
27 mai 2014
Kristina Pardalos, Johannes Silvis, Valeriu Griţco, judges, and Marialena Tsirli, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0328JUD000609116
28 mars 2023
The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. BACKGROUND AND SCOPE OF THE CASE 5.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1108JUD000881916
8 novembre 2022
THE FACTS 2. The applicant was born in 1968 and lives in Berlin. The applicant was represented by Mr C. Partsch, a lawyer practising in Berlin. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0520REP001235086
20 mai 1992
The purpose of the Report, pursuant to Article 31 of the Convention is: i) to establish the facts, and ii) to state an opinion as to whether the facts found disclose