CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-167658
19 septembre 2016
On 27 September 2012 the Bryansk District Court of the Bryansk Region allowed the claim. In its decision it relied on a linguistic expert’s examination of 1 August 2012.
Page 24 sur 58
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1002JUD000259407
2 octobre 2012
The Court notes that the Sabail District Prosecutor’s Office, which was formally an independent investigating authority and which conducted the investigation in the present case, requested the Sabail District
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0410JUD002206207
10 avril 2014
He was taken to the Zagatala District Police Station. 9. According to the applicant, he was repeatedly beaten after his arrival at the Zagatala District Police Station. 10.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0918JUD003728709
18 septembre 2014
On 7 July 2009 the Achkhoy-Martan District Prosecutor’s Office (“the district prosecutor’s office”) had received an application lodged by the applicant which stated that her son had been
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0115DEC001381705
15 janvier 2013
In the course of the compensation proceedings the Zavodskoy District Court of Saratov sought a medical expert opinion.
PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:003-2328023-2506191
18 avril 2008
Estonie (n os 14659/04 et 16855/04) Les requérants sont Alexandre Dorojko, apatride né en 1960, et Vyatcheslav Pojarski, ressortissant estonien né en 1981.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0710JUD004316604
10 juillet 2014
Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of: Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, President, Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos, Ksenija Turković
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:003-2439523-2632469
29 juillet 2008
cette décision définitive ouverte après que le procureur près la cour d’appel de Durrës eut demandé l’autorisation d’interjeter appel hors délai, eu égard aux manquements de la part du procureur de district
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0113DEC000146706
13 janvier 2015
On 18 March 2004 the applicant was awarded by the Oktyabrskiy District Court of Tambov RUB 17,035.69 to be paid by the social insurance body of Tambov.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0505DEC001875191
5 mai 1993
On 17 April 1991 the District Court, after a main hearing, convicted the applicants of smuggling and sentenced them to one month imprisonment each.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1015JUD003388205
15 octobre 2013
The case was registered with the District Court.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0529JUD004171608
29 mai 2012
On 16 November 2006 the Leninskiy District Court extended the applicant’s detention until 19 December 2006.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0407JUD003029519
7 avril 2026
3 Final judgment of 2 May 1995, Bucharest Second District Court Final judgment of 1 March 2019, Bucharest Court of Appeal A. 73,556 (63,556 + 10,000) B. 6,390 3. 41260/19 25
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0320DEC002841203
20 mars 2007
The applicants are the daughter and wife of the deceased Mr Alexandru Guranda, who was a judge of the Chişinău Regional Court. He died in January 2001.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1024JUD003495907
24 octobre 2013
On 18 November 2004 the Proletarskiy District Court of Tula authorised his pre-trial detention.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1106JUD004349409
6 novembre 2017
of the situation in those areas or districts can actually produce their effects.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0228JUD001742305
28 février 2012
On 28 January 2003 the district prosecutor’s office of the Leninskiy District of Vladivostok (“the district prosecutor’s office”) brought criminal proceedings in case no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0115JUD003646105
15 janvier 2015
District Court”). 7.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1010JUD003454106
10 octobre 2013
At about 4 a.m. the applicant met the investigator on duty at the Malgobek district prosecutor’s office (“the district prosecutor’s office”).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1117JUD004772407
17 novembre 2016
The District Court awarded her, inter alia , pecuniary damages in the amount of RUB 928,000. 20.