CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-5755
29 mars 2001
The applicant could therefore have foreseen to a reasonable degree, if necessary by seeking advice from those qualified to give it, that the remarks broadcast during his programme did not render him immune
Page 24 sur 334
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0920JUD000800008
20 septembre 2011
Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. 2.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0415JUD004387509
15 avril 2014
call on his mobile phone asking him to confirm his name, a ruse by the Israeli forces to identify his location.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0305DEC002239306
5 mars 2009
The applicant argued that, in view of the severe condition of his health and his hundred-percent invalidity, the fact that he had been left for five days in his flat without any of his personal belongings
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0918DEC004458221
18 septembre 2025
His complaint was directed solely against Google’s indexing of those articles and the display of links in search results generated by entering his name.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0907DEC003575897
7 septembre 1998
his family or his guardian, neither his older brother residing in the Netherlands nor his temporary guardian were present when he was interviewed.
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0423REP002227793
23 avril 1999
His brother had also spent about 40 million for the costs of his treatment. They had to pay 3 million for films of his head which showed that there were drops of blood in his brain.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0306JUD003595020
6 mars 2025
his special representative.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1005DEC002707795
5 octobre 1999
On 23 July 1993 the applicant withdrew his confession claiming that on 5 July 1993, the day of the crime, he had been at home in Gmunden with his mother.
ECLI:CEDH:002-942
4 mai 2010
The applicant opposed his surrender on the grounds that the delay of well over twenty years between the commission of the alleged offences and his arrest had created a real risk that he would not receive
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0317JUD001566913
17 mars 2020
sister, who was his legal guardian.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0207DEC004238713
7 février 2017
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0828DEC004853999
28 août 2001
between the applicant and his co-defendant, Mr Grant, H. and his woman friend respectively.
ECLI:CEDH:002-7210
18 septembre 2012
”.* In his application to the Court he complains that these States, who he alleges knew and should have known about the rendition programme, the secret detention sites within their territory in which he
Rétention Administrative
67ff3d496d3290e00e0e7a84
15 avril 2025
Copie conforme délivrée le 15 Avril 2025 par courriel à : -l'avocat -le préfet -le CRA -le JLD/TJ -le retenu -le MP Décision déférée à la Cour : Ordonnance rendue
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:0907DEC001226886
7 septembre 1988
ought to have interviewed his parents about his fears of perscution when they came to the United Kingdom; (3) his claim that in view of the evidence supporting his fear of persecution the Secretary
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0323DEC002750495
23 mars 2000
He claimed that his detention was putting a severe strain on his family.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1122DEC000295911
22 novembre 2011
self-mutilation (beating nails into his forehead). 4.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0625JUD000608703
25 juin 2013
The applicant submitted that during his arrest, O.Ž. had pulled him out of the car by his hand, had pulled his hands behind his back and had pushed him to the ground.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1129DEC004022820
29 novembre 2022
Upon his return from the holidays, the applicant told his father that T.R. had slapped him in the face and shouted at him in the presence of his mother and his six-year-old cousin, E., allegedly