'; display:inline-block } .s320E5A8E { width:5.95pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sD051EF8 { width:3.72pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s4196892D { width:3.17pt

Romania , nos.

'; display:inline-block } .s7F175FE6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:51.05pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-17.05pt; text-align:justify } .sE5C1F6E3 { width:3.33pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:

margin-left:18.45pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-18.45pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt; list-style-position:inside } .sE5C1F6E3 { width:3.33pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman

  Romania [GC], no. 41720/13, § 140, 25   June 2019; Makaratzis v.   Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, § 55, ECHR 2004 ‑ XI; and Soare and Others v.

Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, §   1, ECHR 1999 ‑ VI). ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 2 OF THE CONVENTION 60.

He was a normally functioning boy without any unusual needs or problems and it was undisputed that he was very sad because his mother might have to leave them.

'; display:inline-block } .s51DFF5CF { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:34pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-17pt; text-align:justify } .sE5BF05B1 { width:2.33pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block

  Romania , judgment of 22 May 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 ‑ III, p. 1078, § 51). 49.

Romania [GC], no.   28342/95, §   78, ECHR   1999 ‑ VII). 41.

  Romania , no.   124/04, § 55, 7   February 2012; Lagardère   v.   France , no.   18851/07, §§   73 and 76, 12   April 2012; Constantin Florea v.

; font-family:Arial } .sE7D90B8E { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:34pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-17pt; text-align:justify; page-break-after:avoid } .sE5BF05B1 { width:2.33pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman

s71EEDCF9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:48.75pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:-17pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:10pt } .s30C8A987 { width:4.78pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman

Therefore, the presentation or dissemination of suicide recipes through Internet websites or the like cannot normally be punished under section 240.

At that time, X, who is a Romanian national, was living in Romania. They married in December 2016 and in February 2017 X moved to Italy to live with the applicant.

This was because they authorised a serious interference with privacy and because the persons concerned had no direct remedy and would normally learn of the tapping only in retrospect.

0pt; margin-left:42.55pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:-17.05pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:10pt } .sDBC81028 { width:4.83pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman

'; display:inline-block } .s7AE800C3 { width:4.28pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s743F3A55 { margin-right:0pt; margin-left:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s2044A09A { margin-left:6.51pt

'; display:inline-block } .s7F175FE6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:51.05pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-17.05pt; text-align:justify } .sE5C1F6E3 { width:3.33pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:

They emphasised that Article 6 does not normally apply to proceedings concerning extraordinary remedies, such as the reopening of a case.