In particular, to what extent are the duties and responsibilities inherent in the applicant company’s activities relevant to its claim and the State’s margin of appreciation in this field

    What period is to be taken into account for the length of proceedings in the present case?

Applicant's liability established in reasoning that merely reproduced the wording of section 4 without sufficiently specifying in what way he had attempted to convince his neighbour by improper means;

In addition, the importance of what was at stake for Romanian society, namely the right of the numerous victims to know what had happened, implying the right to an effective judicial investigation and

In his application to the European Court, he complained under Article   7 of the Convention that that provision was not sufficiently precise or foreseeable to enable him to determine what conduct

In particular, what was the basis for the diagnosis of concussion given to the applicant on 9 October 2008?

    In particular, what were the grounds for annulment of the applicant’s title? Was the applicant a bona fide buyer?

If no, for what reasons? 4.2.     If the relevant authorities did not comply with the interim measure indicated by the Court on 28 May 2021, what were the reasons for that?

applicant maintains that he had obtained several reports from university hospitals attesting to his inability to work and that the domestic courts relied solely on the report which does not state on what

    What is the purpose of the pre- and post- apprenticeship interviews?   2.     How are the candidates evaluated?

(a)     If so, what were the reasons and were they duly reviewed by the domestic courts?

    What was the total duration of the applicant’s detention in an individual unit (see Öcalan , cited above, §§ 137-45, and Bora v. Turkey (dec.), no.

with the applicant’s right to respect for her family life within the meaning of Article 8 § 1 of the Convention, If so, was that interference necessary in terms of Article 8 § 2, also having regard to what

Whether the interference was justified (a)   "In the public interest" National authorities enjoy certain margin of appreciation in determining what is "in the public interest" - on issues of social

If not, and given the absence of the applicant and her lawyer from the hearings after she gave evidence, what steps did the trial court take to secure her presence and to enable her to exercise her defence

In this context, to what extent did this interference affect the applicant’s pecuniary rights?   2.

    What was the total duration of the applicant’s detention in an individual unit (see Öcalan , cited above, §§ 137-45, and Bora v. Turkey (dec.), no.

  Exactly what evidence and documents were each of the applicants able to access from the confiscation case file?