In the present case the court informed the applicant about the legal-aid lawyer's refusal by a letter of 14   July 2005.

} .s583D00FA { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:17pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-17pt } .s26FF04E7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:17.3pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s8DCCCE3B { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:17pt

:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA1CDB767 { margin-top:6pt; margin-left:21.25pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:7.1pt; text-align:justify; font-size:10pt } .sFD4D42B6 { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:

{ margin-top:0pt; margin-left:17pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17pt } .sEB98FB19 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sAA9E2EC9 { width:14.68pt; display:inline-block } .sBA8DCCFC

:8.8pt; font-size:10pt } .sEEE3CE35 { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:20.15pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:8.8pt; font-size:10pt } .s160BBE39 { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:20.15pt; margin-bottom:6pt;

A 11h52, la Bnp Paribas a informé les deux sociétés de ce qu'elle procédait à une procédure de « recall » (ou call back) pou rappeler les fonds, qui n'ont cependant pu été récupérés.

:24pt; margin-left:17.85pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17.85pt } .sB20C2835 { margin-top:24pt; margin-left:29.2pt; margin-bottom:24pt; text-indent:-17.6pt } .s7BB60D65 { margin-top:24pt; margin-left

    In a letter of 21 October 2008 the applicant informed the Court that he did not agree that the Government’s unilateral declaration constituted a reason justifying the striking out of the

margin-left:17.3pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s308FBE0C { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:17.3pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify } .s3B3A5DE9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:36pt; text-indent

:-0.1pt } .s13F94BDE { font-family:Arial; letter-spacing:-0.1pt } .s9C91EB7E { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-style:italic; letter-spacing:-0.1pt; vertical-align:super } .s48FEA97C { font-family

0.1pt } .s9C91EB7E { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-style:italic; letter-spacing:-0.1pt; vertical-align:super } .sAB173E38 { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:17pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-17pt

:10pt } .s8B441743 { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:7.1pt; text-align:justify } .s8A9F351B { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:21.25pt; margin-bottom:24pt; text-indent:

Nous nous acquittons simplement de notre devoir devant le lecteur pour montrer à celui-ci leur vrai visage de Janus, les deux têtes en face, parées de masques, mais tout de même apparentes.

margin-left:17.3pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s81CCF55C { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:17pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom

:0pt; text-align:justify } .s60723A49 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:39.7pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s81CCF55C { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:17pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17pt;

:-0.1pt } .sC83B07C { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s936EB0A2 { width:17.01pt; display:inline-block } .s8354CF86 { width:259.15pt; display:inline-block } .sE1FE03D3

The court interpreted the letter of 15   January 2014 issued by the police department as a request for information from the psychiatrist as to whether the applicant suffered from any mental illness

A copy of that letter was also addressed to the relevant local government authorities for information. 13 .

:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF00C10F9 { width:29.8%; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt

L'audience de plaidoiries fut fixée au 16 mars 1997 et, selon les informations fournies par le Gouvernement, fut renvoyée à la demande de la requérante.