orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial }       The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights

:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top

The Split Municipality also agreed that T.K.S. could register the right to use the tennis courts in the land registry. 7.

  849 27.11.2008   Press release issued by the Registrar   HEARING IN DECEMBER   The European Court of Human Rights will be holding the following hearing in December 2008 :  

, including their right to work and social security.

Thus, the right to have third parties prosecuted or sentenced for a criminal offence cannot be asserted independently; it must be indissociable from the victim’s exercise of a right to bring civil proceedings

The Government acknowledged the violation of the applicants’ rights under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, and in relation to application no.

page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 11 July 2022   FIRST SECTION Application no. 35519/21 Danijel

    51886/21 23/09/2021 Alla Pavlovna MENSHIKOVA 1997   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   St Petersburg   31/01/2021 article 20.2.2 §   1 of CAO

    49096/21 28/09/2021 Dmitriy Igorevich ZAKHAROV 1997     Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine

  They rely on Articles 6 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time) and 13 (right to an effective remedy).   Kaja v.

North Macedonia 20/10/2021 Daniel STANCHEV 1985 Skopje Slave STANCHEV 3. 14211/22 Rashkovski v. North Macedonia 07/03/2022 Dragi RASHKOVSKI 1984 Skopje Veronika RASHKOVSKA 4. 19444/22 Stanchev v.

Hungary, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Erik Wennerström, President,   Lorraine Schembri Orland,   Ioannis Ktistakis, judges, and

vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 32638/19 Tünde KOSZORÚ against Hungary and 9 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights

s34C6B0A7 { height:17.95pt }     FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 34803/16 Vasile COEV against Romania and 15 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights

It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications

It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications

vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }     FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 3382/20 István VARGA against Hungary and 9 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights

font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 38988/18 Ferenc VARSÁNYI against Hungary and 9 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights

xa0; FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 58597/14 Miklós Mátyásné BRACZKÓ and Petra Zsofia BRACZKO against Hungary and 9 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights