The court rejected this claim. On 18 July 2000 the court dismissed the applicants' action against the Social Security Authority.

It also noted a lack of coherence in the OJSC’s position, as during the proceedings it had abandoned its claim seeking a declaration of its title to the building and the claim seeking repossession of the

    The Government contested these claims. 38.

The Thule Tribe’s claim for damages (Claim 3) The primary claim for damages in the amount of around DKK 235 million relates in the first place to the Thule Tribe’s loss owing to the lost and reduced hunting

The applicants appealed to the Aliens Appeals Board ( Utlänningsnämnden ), maintaining their claims and adding that the whole family was in poor mental health, particularly the fourth applicant who had

of the compulsory service period to pay the State certain sums in order to reimburse the expenses incurred in training them was fully justified in the light of the privileges which they enjoyed as compared

;   Conclusion – Violence against women was, as the Preamble to the Istanbul Convention made clear, one of the crucial social mechanisms by which women were forced into a subordinate position compared

In the Court’s view, it is apparent from the documents in the case file that the situation in the municipality of Benevento could not be compared to the significantly more serious one in other provinces

The court also granted the tax authorities’ claims against the applicants in respect of unpaid taxes and ordered confiscation of multiple real properties and various other assets belonging to them.

The applicant wished to have his DNA profile compared to the one created by X in respect of another private individual, S.D., with a view to determining if the applicant and S.D. were son and mother.

    Having regard to the amount awarded – which was not manifestly unreasonable compared to what the Court would have granted in a similar situation (see, for instance, the awards granted in

    The Government contested these claims. 18.

may file a civil claim for damages before   the competent court.

MUTUELLE DES ARCHITECTES FRANCAIS (MAF) [Adresse 3] [Localité 10] assistés de Me Frédérique BARRE, membre de la SELARL BARRE-LE GLEUT, avocat au barreau de LYON, plaidant, et représentés par Me Sarah COVAREL

On 14 June 2007 the Sovetskiy District Court of Tomsk dismissed the applicant’s claim.

suivant : Sur le rapport de Mme le conseiller NOCQUET, les observations de la société civile professionnelle NICOLAY et de LANOUVELLE, avocat en la Cour, et les conclusions de Mme l'avocat général COMMARET

le conseiller référendaire de la LANCE, les observations de la société civile professionnelle PIWNICA et MOLINIE, et de Me FOUSSARD, avocats en la Cour, et les conclusions de Mme l'avocat général COMMARET

Inadequacy of procedure for protecting health of remand prisoner suffering from serious illness: violation   Article 14 Discrimination Unjustified difference in treatment of remand prisoners compared

Accordingly, the applicant could claim to be the victim of discrimination on grounds of gender. It followed that Article   14 taken in conjunction with Article   8 was also applicable.