On 15 February 1996 the Oktyabrskiy District Court of Grozny confirmed that the second applicant owned a share of the property situated at 40/21 Vozrozhdeniya/Fontannaya Street.

    On 24 July 2004 the prosecutor’s office of the Republic of Ingushetia forwarded the first applicant’s complaint to the prosecutor’s office of the Sunzhenskiy District (“the district prosecutor

    On 6   January   2004 Y.M., a Greek national, was declared the father of the second applicant by the Kraków-Podgórze District Court.

    On 18 July 2000 the Kentron and Nork-Marash District Court of Yerevan granted the first applicant’s claim.

On 15 June 2002 the Perovo District Court of Moscow sentenced him to imprisonment.

    A further inquiry was entrusted to the same district prosecutor.

Le 21 octobre 1993, le gouvernement de la République de Moldova a adopté la décision n o 658 relative au logement des citoyens forcés de quitter leurs domiciles dans les districts de l’est de Moldova.

    By a judgment of 23 September 2002 the Vetluga District Court of the Nizhniy Novgorod Region (“the District Court”) granted in part the applicant’s claim for recovery of unpaid military allowance

  La requérante se plaignait que l’inaction du tribunal de district avait permis à son ex-mari d’emmener F. en Turquie.

An expert opinion written by Professor M.C. was quoted several times in the Lappeenranta District Court’s judgment.   The parties appealed against the judgment.

The Regional Court therefore referred the action to the competent District Court ( Bezirks ­ gericht ) for examination.

    On the same day the Shevchenko District Police instituted criminal proceedings in connection with E.A.’s death. 9.

    On 18 October 2003 the Vlora District Court (“the District Court”) made an order in absentia for the applicants to be remanded in custody.

    On 30 June 2005 the District Court held a preliminary hearing.

    On 21 March 2008 the Narimanov District Court examined the prosecutor’s request.

    On 30 June 2005 the Tverskoy District Court held a preliminary hearing.

On 27 January 1997 the Supreme Court of Justice sent the case for examination to the Bucharest District Court.

The Bucharest District Court gave its judgment on 18   May 1998.

    In 1987, the applicants brought an action for damages before the Ancona District Court, arguing that the occupation of the land had been unlawful and seeking compensation. 6 .