Summary of the facts     On 18 June 1993, the applicants, who had been elected to the San Marinese Parliament (“ Consiglio Grande e Generale ”), took their oath of office in writing without

The applicants challenged the measure before the competent judicial bodies of the Chamber of Deputies, namely the Consiglio di Giurisdizione at first instance and the Collegio d’Appello on appeal, which

On 7   August   2015 the Consiglio di Stato dismissed the appeal.

However, such proceedings ended unfavourably with a judgment of the Consiglio di Stato of 8 April 2015. QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES 1.

  Le 16 novembre 1995, le Parlement ( Consiglio Grande e Generale ), dans le cadre de la nouvelle loi sur la protection de l'environnement et la sauvegarde du paysage, de la végétation et de la flore

The applicants then sued for the excess but their claims failed when the Supreme Administrative Court ( Consiglio di Stato ) changed its previous case-law.

  157/2022 before the Consiglio di Stato . 49 .     By judgment no.   9166 of 27   October 2022, the Consiglio di Stato dismissed the appeal.

  La ricorrente adì il Consiglio di giustizia amministrativa per la regione Sicilia. 12.

    The relevant domestic law and practice applicable in this case was summarised in Guiso and Consiglio v. Italy (dec.), no.   50821/06, §§   25-31, 16   January 2018).

    On 7   March 1988 the Treasury appealed to the Consiglio di Stato .

Le requérant se trouva donc dans l’impossibilité de prendre part aux élections du 23 avril 1995 visant à désigner les membres du conseil régional et du conseil provincial («   Consiglio Regionale

  Cornilia Eufrosina Radu c. Roumanie (n° 65402/01) Violation de l’article 6 § 1 (équité)   Săvulescu c.

End: date of deposit with registry of Consiglio di Stato ’s judgment (De Santa); date on which RAC’s judgment became final (Lapalorcia); proceedings still pending (Abenavoli and Nicodemo).

THE LAW The Court notes that the applicants did not raise their complaints before the school governing body ( Consiglio di intersezione ), which could have submit proposals for education and teaching to

Her complaints were dismissed by a decision that was upheld at final instance by the Consiglio di Stato .

Application no. 13935/23 Gloria GIARDI against San Marino lodged on 16 March 2023 communicated on 26 March 2024 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns a decision by the San Marino Parliament ( Consiglio

    Ecoservizi lodged an appeal with the Consiglio di Stato .

By judgment no. 3706 of 26 August 2016, the Consiglio di Stato ruled that enforcement of the 2010 judgment was precluded by “legal and factual obstacles”, including the fact that the relevant debts had

Thus the Consiglio di Stato had held that the exercise by the Ministry of its right of pre-emption fell into the category of expropriation measures and that in this case the administrative authorities

analogous complaint, concerning the same tax measure as the one in the present case, would be from the standpoint of a control of the use of property “to secure the payment of taxes” (see Guiso and Consiglio