On 8, 12 and 15 December the applicant read the case file.

The relevant part of the appellate court's judgment reads as follows: “...

cabinet Sevellec Dauchel Cresson - Maître Guillaume DAUCHEL Avocat (W09) ET : SARL HUBERT AMENC AUDIT, dont le siège social est [Adresse 2] - RCS B 414937490 Partie défenderesse : assistée de Me REGADE

Rezard, premier conseiller, M. Lautard-Mattioli, premier conseiller. Rendu public par mise à disposition au greffe le 28 juin 2024. La présidente-rapporteure, K.

Rezard, premier conseiller, M. Lautard-Mattioli, premier conseiller. Rendu public par mise à disposition au greffe le 28 juin 2024. La présidente-rapporteure, K.

Rezard, premier conseiller, M. Lautard-Mattioli, conseiller. Rendu public par mise à disposition au greffe le 6 octobre 2023. La présidente-rapporteure, K.

Rezard, premier conseiller, Mme Berland, première conseillère. Rendu public par mise à disposition au greffe le 21 mars 2025. La présidente-rapporteure, K.

Rezard, premier conseiller, Mme Berland, première conseillère. Rendu public par mise à disposition au greffe le 21 mars 2025. La présidente rapporteure, K.

, the defence lawyer and the victim, if they are present, shall have the right to read the minutes or to ask that they be read to them.

Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of association) read in the light of Article 9 - (Art. 9) Freedom of thought, conscience and religion (Article 9-1

    Therefore, the applicant’s complaint must be examined from the standpoint of Article 8 of the Convention read in the light of Article 9. 37.

violation of Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to free elections-{general} (Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Vote);No violation of Article 14 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) read

    Article 16 of the Constitution, as far as relevant, reads as follows: “Freedom of personal belief, conscience, and thought, and public expression of thought, are guaranteed.

The relevant parts of Article 5 read as follows: “1.     Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person.

    Before the High Court of Eastern Denmark ( Østre Landsret ), a written statement submitted by the first applicant was read out.

Law – Article 10 of the Convention read in the light of Article   11: The arrest, detention and conviction of the applicant constituted an interference with her right to freedom of expression, which

That provision reads as follows: “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ..., everyone is entitled to a ... hearing within a reasonable time by [a] ... tribunal...”

The Court's envelope bears two red stamps that read “Censored” ( “ocenzurowano” ). One of those stamps was put on the outside and another on the inside.

Law – Article 11 read in the light of Article   10 (a)     Whether there had been an interference with the exercise of the right to freedom of peaceful assembly – The events which had developed

That provision reads as follows: “In [Note1] the determination of his civil rights and obligations ..., everyone is entitled to a ... hearing within a reasonable time by [a] ... tribunal....”