CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-113351
3 septembre 2012
The termination was reasoned with intended staff reduction and suppression of posts under the terms of UN staff rule 109.1 (c).
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-13427
12 octobre 2021
international treaties and had signed agreements with other sovereign powers; it had diplomatic relations with some 185 States and was recognised as a State in particular by Belgium.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1102JUD003815502
2 novembre 2010
It accepts that the legal issue at stake was not a matter of general concern to the whole of society, such as the conflicting case-law on restitution at stake in the case of Tudor Tudor v.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0912DEC003339496
12 septembre 2000
The doctor’s note of his examination of the applicant at 12-35 a.m. states: “Patient complained of feeling cold, headache and queasy (no food since admission - offered but refused).
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1202DEC004154122
2 décembre 2025
In addition, all the evidence must normally be produced at a public hearing, in the presence of the accused, with a view to adversarial argument.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0202DEC004369905
2 février 2010
On 4 October 2001 the applicant was informed by the Dean of the University that his admission to the University had been annulled.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1128JUD005014213
28 novembre 2017
Pintar Gosenca, State Attorney. 3.
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0906REP002722995
6 septembre 1999
  Staff to be aware." 46.       The entry for 7 May 1993 records:     "Keenan seen by doctor. Refused medication. Staff to still offer medication.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0116DEC005134699
16 janvier 2001
In addition, the applicant had at no stage argued that her freedom of assembly had been infringed.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0721JUD006377709
21 juillet 2015
Where the judicial or administrative authority in the requested State has reason to believe that the child has been taken to another State, it may stay the proceedings or dismiss the application for the
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1128JUD001021606
absence at the trial and for the difficulties caused to the defence by the admission of their untested statements as evidence (such as pre-trial confrontation interviews or an opportunity to put questions
3ème chambre jugeant seule
ECLI:FR:CECHS:2022:454734.20220407
7 avril 2022
; - de dénaturation des faits et des pièces du dossier pour avoir jugé qu'elle ne pouvait être admise à prolonger son stage, alors que, premièrement, c'est la défaillance de l'encadrement de son stage
ECLI:CEDH:002-11675
5 septembre 2017
In addition, the notion of “correspondence” covered the sending and receiving of communications, even on an employer’s computer.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1110JUD000791807
10 novembre 2016
He   then   made statements about the incident which were similar to those which he had made earlier. 14.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1220JUD001829903
20 décembre 2011
The documents include witness statements by those who participated in negotiations with the terrorists; witness statements from several former hostages; witness statements from officials from the public
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0625DEC004047713
25 juin 2019
In addition, the appellant considers that the absence of staff capable of assisting a disabled person is not decisive if third parties are willing to help, third parties that he was in this instance willing
ECLI:CEDH:002-1330
17 septembre 2009
problems, providing him with the appropriate medical care and ordering his admission to hospital where necessary.
ECLI:CEDH:001-142233
4 mars 2014
  Section 116, which allows for the admission of statements of absent witnesses, provides: “(1) In criminal proceedings a statement not made in oral evidence in the proceedings is admissible as evidence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1123JUD000838620
23 novembre 2023
Chatzipavlou, senior advisors at the State Legal Council, and Mr G.
ECLI:CEDH:002-5474
6 décembre 2001
In August 1933 the State expropriated the land. In December 1933 compensation proceedings were instituted against the State by the owners.
Page 27 sur 2628