34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS

COMPLAINTS The applicants complained under Article 3 of the Convention about the conditions of their detention (all applicants) and lack of adequate medical care (except for Mrs Căpăţînă ) in the various

Therefore, they should be struck out of the list in accordance with Article   39   §   3 of the Convention. 3.

  France , no. 588/13, §§ 37-42, 22 February 2018)? If so, was that interference compatible with the requirements of Article 8 § 2?

Bulgaria (communicated case) - 27455/22   Article 6 Administrative proceedings Article 6-1 Impartial tribunal Supreme Administrative Court’s alleged lack of impartiality to rule on its own liability

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 10 of the Convention 8.     The remaining applicants complained principally of the various restrictions on the right to freedom of expression.

In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue the applications (Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention)

They further requested the Court to strike out the applications in accordance with Article 37 of the Convention.

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   11 OF THE CONVENTION 7.

8 of the Convention. 12.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 10 OF THE CONVENTION 14.

juge des contentieux de la protection assistée de Delphine VANHOVE, Greffière Décision du 22 décembre 2023 PCP JCP référé - N° RG 23/08629 - N° Portalis 352J-W-B7H-C3HNE EXPOSE DU LITIGE Par contrat

He also alleged violation of Article 6 of the Convention since the courts failed to consider his compensation claim.

    Alleged violation of the Article 6 § 1 of the Convention 8.

The applicant in case no. 65162/14 also raised other complaints under various articles of the Convention.

On 22   December 2022, the applicants lodged with the Court a request for interim measures under Article   39 of the Rules of the Court.

    The applicants also raised other complaints under various Articles of the Convention, in particular under Article 6 of the Convention in application no. 34902/22 and Article 18 of the Convention

    The communicated complaints under Article 3, Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) and (d) and Article 13 of the Convention 19.

February 2021   SECOND SECTION Application no. 28662/16 Dragan ILIĆ against Serbia lodged on 12 May 2016 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applicant complains, under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention,