800 euros au profit de Me Hajer Hmad au titre des frais exposés et non compris dans les dépens.

Thus, the applicant had to be understood as alleging that the Regional Court had not correctly exercised its discretion.

It further held that it had not been established that the fence qualified for legalisation.

They noted, in particular, that they had found rubber gloves and a hammer of an unknown origin on the table in his room, which could have been used to murder Mr   A.Kh.

This had been confirmed by the counsel.

had been absolutely necessary.

The Court accordingly considered that Mr Destrehem had not had a fair trial and held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d).

Bank had initially credited the cheque to the account, but had subsequently sent it back to the N. Savings Bank, since the latter had refused payment.

  He complained that the lower courts had disregarded this vital information although he had pointed it out in his submissions and although he had requested a hearing in order to hear witnesses in

  Moreover, even if S. was to be punished for tax evasion, he, the applicant, could not be found guilty of abetment as he had only acted as a lawyer and had not had insight into the income and fortune

In 1993, before the building work had been completed, he had learned that he was building on a plot of land which was not the plot that had been allocated to him, and that his partially-built house was

de la SELARL HAAS SOCIETE D’AVOCATS, avocats au barreau de Paris, vestiaire #K0059.

The Disciplinary Board had found that the applicant had neglected the creditors of his limited company.

  Hans Corell, Ministry of Foreign Affairs.   2.

The doctor in charge of the emergency ward noted that the applicant had suffered a head injury measuring 4 cm by 1 cm inflicted by a hammer. 8.

conséquence EDF à payer une certaine somme, l'arrêt retient qu'à l'ouest se situe le surplus de la parcelle Z0-3 et que la SMPL a reçu l'autorisation d'exploiter cette parcelle globale pour une superficie de 3 ha

. # Liselotte Hauer tegen Land Rheinland-Pfalz. # Verzoek om een prejudiciële beslissing: Verwaltungsgericht Neustadt an der Weinstraße - Duitsland. # Verbod van aanplant van wijnstokken. # Zaak 44/79.

. # Hjælpeansatte - ansættelse i en stilling, der tidligere har været beklædt af en midlertidigt ansat. # Sag 329/85.

#Weber Haus GmbH & Co. KG tegen Finanzamt Freiburg-Land.#Verzoek om een prejudiciële beslissing: Bundesfinanzhof - Duitsland.#Bijeenbrengen van kapitaal - Kapitaalrecht - Winstoverdracht.

#Hans Hönig mot Stadt Stockach.#Begäran om förhandsavgörande: Bundesverwaltungsgericht - Tyskland.#Direktiv 88/166/EEG - Minimibestämmelser avseende skyddet för värphöns som hålls i batteriburar.