1 to the Convention had been violated as a result of the failure to enforce the final judgment in their favour.

    On 17 April 2003 the Ministry informed the applicant that the judgment in his favour had been enforced.

Those decisions in the applicants’ favour became final and enforceable but the State delayed their enforcement.

On 15   February 2009 the applicant chanted slogans in favour of the leader of an illegal organisation, Abdullah   Öcalan. On 24   April 2009 he attended the Newroz celebration.

Presumption of innocence Refusal of compensation for miscarriage of justice, following quashing of applicants’ criminal convictions as “unsafe”, for failing to meet new statutory test: relinquishment in favour

The application concerns an alleged breach of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention on account of the quashing of a final decision given in the applicant’s favour

The applicant complained about non-enforcement of a judgment in his favour.

MLKP, an illegal armed organisation, under Articles   220 §   6 and 314 of the Criminal Code and the criminal proceedings brought against her with the charge of disseminating propaganda in favour

alleged unfairness of proceedings concerning the payment of damages under the State Liability Act due to the quashing, by a judgment of the Constitutional Court, of a final and binding judgment in favour

The court, without holding an oral hearing, gave judgment in his favour. However, the Social Insurance Board appealed to the Administrative Court of Appeal.

On 27 January 2009 the Chamber to which the case had been allocated relinquished jurisdiction in favour of the Grand Chamber under Article 30 [1] of the Convention, and a Grand Chamber hearing was held

    The applicants complained of a prolonged non-enforcement of the “Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus” (“TRNC”) Immovable Property Commission (“IPC”) award made in their favour, the absence

Presumption of innocence Refusal of compensation for miscarriage of justice, following quashing of applicants’ criminal convictions as “unsafe”, for failing to meet new statutory test: relinquishment in favour

The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1of the Convention about the failure to enforce a judgment in his favour.

The applicant complains, under Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention, about the failure of the domestic authorities to enforce a final civil court judgment in her favour, in particular the fact that a criminal

21 janvier 2025, RG : 24/00269 INTIMÉS : Madame [L] [B] née le 15 juin 1979 à [Localité 7] de nationalité française domiciliée : [Adresse 2] [Localité 6] représentée par Me Betty FAGOT

Admissible under Article 6 § 1 (fair hearing and within a reasonable time) and relinquishment of jurisdiction in the case in favour of the Grand Chamber subject to the parties’ agreement.

A B d'évacuer sans délai l'emplacement qu'il occupe sans autorisation sur la plage de Favone à Sari-Solenzara et de retirer les ouvrages qu'il y a installés, sous astreinte de 1 500 euros par jour de retard

Par mémoire enregistré le 16 octobre 2023, la société Acte Iard, représentée par la société Cabinet Laurent Favet, agissant par Me Favet, conclut aux mêmes fins que la requête, par les mêmes moyens.