}       SECOND SECTION Application no. 22567/09 Claudio BRAMBILLA and others against Italy lodged on 21 April 2009 STATEMENT OF FACTS   The applicants, Mr Claudio Brambilla, Mr Daniele

Date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth   Representative’s name and location Facility Start and end date Duration Sq. m per inmate Specific grievances Amount awarded for pecuniary and

It sets out in detail the requirements for personal data to be obtained and processed with or without the consent of the person concerned, and its storage and destruction.

Date of introduction Applicant name Date of birth   Representative name and location Facility Start and end date Duration Sq. m. per inmate Specific grievances Amount awarded for non-pecuniary damage

Daniele and their Co-Agent Mr Guido Bellatti Ceccoli. 3.

MILOSHEVSKA 1960   Zorka MILOSHEVSKA 1957   Vesna MLADENOVIKJ 1965   Ubavka MLADENOVSKA 1966   Danica NASKOVSKA 1966   Snezhana PAVLOVSKA 1962   Roza PETROVSKA 1962  

At this stage, the applicant’s family consisted of his children Charles aged 14, Michael aged 13, Daniel aged 10 and Thomas aged 4 months.

Daniela ANGHELUȘ Romanian 1967 Bucharest   Apt. no. 10, Radu Cristian St (Universităţii Square)., 71 sqm Bucharest + appurtenant land 16.12.2003 Bucharest Court of Appeal 16.12.2003 Bucharest Court

-     a decision to allow the operation of the plant would be inappropriate; -     the choice of the site had been made in violation of the applicable laws; -     the storage

Diffusion ; que la société BRM était située 14, rue de Castiglione à Paris et disposait de locaux professionnels sis 29, rue Danielle Casanova à Paris ; que Loïc X... avait apporté à la société BRM, lors

He was represented by Mr Daníel Isebarn Ágústsson, a lawyer practising in Reykjavik. 3.

#Responsabilità extracontrattuale degli Stati membri - Danni arrecati ai singoli da violazioni del diritto comunitario imputabili ad un organo giurisdizionale di ultimo grado - Limitazione, da parte del

tranżizzjoni – Ġurisdizzjoni tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja – Sentenza tas-Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (il-Qorti Suprema tar-Renju Unit) – Eżekuzzjoni ta’ deċiżjoni ta’ arbitraġġ li tagħti l-ħlas tad-danni

    Following the conviction, the Commission commenced proceedings against the first applicant and his wife (the second applicant, Ms Daniela Dimova), and in 2009 made a forfeiture application

    On 16 February 2004 the local development plan was amended to permit the construction of a new four-storey building attached to the side of the applicant’s house.

  Daniel, lawyers practising in St Petersburg, Russia, and Norfolk, United Kingdom, respectively. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr G.

against the Republic of Bulgaria lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Bulgarian national, Ms Daniela