bruts à titre de dommages et intérêts pour carence irrégulière des représentants du personnel, - 5.480,17 euros bruts à titre de dommages et intérêts pour délivrance tardive des documents - 13.700,42 erous

  Erkol et A. Aslan, recueillies sur commission rogatoire.

Kivipää Eero Klemetti Veijo Kalevi Knuuttila Markku Kohonen Jorma Koivisto Timo Johannes Koivisto Janne Koivunen Kimmo Kristian Koivuniemi Tomi Konsala Eero Juhani Konttiaho Arto Armas Korento Ahti Erkku

1947 Ankara   Haci ÇAKIROĞLU Kahramanmaraş   Hüseyin KORLAELÇİ Kahramanmaraş   Zeliha ÇAKIROĞLU Kahramanmaraş   Döne KARA Kahramanmaraş   Ayşe GENÇ Kahramanmaraş   Melek ERKOÇ

Turkey , no. 34388/05, §   32, 12 April   2011; Erkol v. Turkey , no. 50172/06, §§ 38-41, 19 April 2011; Tripon v. Romania (dec.) no. 27062/04 § 25, CEDH, 7 February 2012; Teodor v.

it was not necessary to carry out a fresh assessment of the applicant’s son’s role in the assault against V.M. because it had already been established (see paragraph 23 above; see, mutatis mutandis , Erkol

  Norway , no. 31283/04, §§ 47-49, 15 May 2008; Erkol v. Turkey , no.   50172/06, §§ 33 and 37, 19 April 2011; Vulakh and Others v. Russia , no.

Norway , no. 31283/04, §§   47 ‑ 49, 15 May 2008; Erkol v.   Turkey , no. 50172/06, §§ 33 and 37, 19   April 2011; Vulakh and Others v.

Sweden (dec.), no. 48518/99, ECHR   2003-XI; Erkol v.   Turkey , no. 50172/06, § 37, 19 April 2011; and Allen , cited above, § 123): “...

Norway , no. 31283/04, §§ 47-49, 15 May 2008; Erkol v.   Turkey , no. 50172/06, §§ 33 and 37, 19 April 2011; Vulakh and Others v.

of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Failure to communicate the prosecutor’s opinion Failure/Delay to communicate decisions relating to detention Lack of reasonable suspicion 199 45995/20 Erko