final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the G.J. case delivered on 26   October 2000 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;

    As regards the question whether the Court is prevented by Article 46 of the Convention from dealing with the complaints made by the applicant, the Court reiterates that questions of compliance

l’article 5, paragraphe 1, ainsi qu'une violation des obligations des États défendeurs de se conformer aux arrêts de la Cour conformément à l'article 46, paragraphe 1, de la Convention, et qu’en conséquence

rendu le 27 février 2001 dans l'affaire Lucà et transmis une fois définitif au Comité des Ministres en vertu des articles 44 et 46 de la Convention   ;   Rappelant qu'à l'origine de cette affaire

Cour européenne des Droits de l’Homme rendu le 28 juin 2001 dans l’affaire F.R. et transmis une fois définitif au Comité des Ministres en vertu des articles 44 et 46 de la Convention   ;   Rappelant

Ministers concerning the application of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention; Whereas during the examination of the case by the Committee of Ministers, the government of the respondent state indicated

judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Caballero case delivered on 8 February 2000 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Aggiato case delivered on 29 February 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers on the same date under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Witold Litwa case delivered on 4 April 2000 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that the

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Varey case delivered on 21 December 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers on the same date under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that

judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Nuutinen case delivered on 27 June 2000 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Edelmayer case delivered on 19 December 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that the case originated

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Freunberger case delivered on 19 December 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that the case originated

final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Pawlinkowska case delivered on 8 July 2003 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;  

final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Ostrowski case delivered on 28 September 2004 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;

final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Gündüz and others delivered on 14 November 2000 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention

final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Yolcu case delivered on 5 February 2002 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;  

Court of Human Rights in the Ferreira Pinto case delivered on 26 June 2003 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;   Recalling that the case

final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Morais Sarmento case delivered on 3 October 2002 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention