Elle précise que la cour d'appel étant saisie de conclusions vides de toutes prétentions, la Cour de cassation a admis que l'intimée, qui pouvait se prévaloir de l'absence d'effet dévolutif, pouvait également

Toulouse, représenté par Me Cara, conclut ne pas s’opposer à la demande d’expertise formulée, qu’il entend voir confiée à un expert spécialisé en neurochirurgie, exerçant en dehors du ressort de la cour

  1, taking into account, in particular, the judgment of the Tekirdağ Administrative Court dated 7   July 2007, the expert report submitted during the course of the second set of proceedings

of that count.

On 21 November 2007 the Katowice District Court [III K 2245/07] asked the Katowice Court of Appeal whether the case could be transferred to the Regional Court.

APPELANTE Madame [W] [Z] demeurant [Adresse 14] - [Localité 12] représentée par Me Rachel COURT-MENIGOZ de la SELARL CABINET FRANCOIS & ASSOCIES, avocat au barreau D'AIX-EN-PROVENCE INTIMÉE

Par des mémoires, enregistrés les 21 mars 2024, 26 avril 2024 et 6 juin 2024, le département des Bouches-du-Rhône, représenté par Me Court-Menigoz, conclut au rejet de la requête et à ce que la somme de

Without prejudice to its power to examine the compatibility of national decisions with the Convention, it was not the Court's task to assess itself the facts on which a national court based its decision

Referring to the exceptions to the jurisdiction of the courts listed in Article 248-3 of the CCvP, the Court of Appeal stated that the applicant's complaint could not be considered in the course of that

    On 17 May 2012 the Supreme Court gave judgment. It quashed the Regional Court’s judgment in respect of the conviction for one count of fraud. It remitted the case in this part.

On 25 September 2015 the Government informed the Court about the medical examinations the applicant had undergone during the period following the Court’s decision to indicate the interim measure.

The Court, by a majority, dismissed the Russian Government’s objection concerning the allegedly similar application lodged with the ICJ, after noting that that court had declined jurisdiction in a judgment

Sentenza della Corte (Sesta Sezione) del 18 aprile 1989.#François Retter contro Caisse de pension des employés privés.#Domanda di pronuncia pregiudiziale proposta da Cour supérieure de justice.

From the court’s decision it is unclear what information on the “applicant’s character” the court referred to.

LEKA 1978 albanais Larisa 13 Konstantinos LISIS 1960 albanais Larisa 14 Ilir LITO 1971 albanais Larisa 15 Taulant MANDIJA 1973 albanais Larisa 16 Arben MASHI 1975 albanais Larisa 17 Sokrati-Sokratis MENIKO-MENIKOS

court on 6 November 2017 (as confirmed by that court in writing).

code civil ; Attendu, selon l'arrêt confirmatif attaqué, qu'en exécution d'un courrier à en-tête d'une société Elite-express et portant le logo de la société TCS, la société Bron-course a effectué

[I] [S] représentée par Me [S] [R], demeurant [Adresse 1] représentée par Me Philippe SAMAK, avocat au barreau de NICE substitué par Me Rachel COURT-MENIGOZ, avocat au barreau d'AIX-EN-PROVENCE

    The proceedings before the Trier Regional Court On 31 July 2008 the Trier Regional Court convicted the applicant of two counts of drug trafficking while carrying a weapon and another count

The court found that there was no evidence that the applicant would abscond or pervert the course of justice if released.