that the Maltese authorities take the necessary measures to ensure that all immigration detainees currently being held in the two Warehouses at Safi Barracks are transferred as soon as possible to Ta’ Kandja

/01/1953 Antalya   Halil ADALı 09/02/1954 Antalya   Şadiye SÖNMEZ 08/03/1957 Antalya   Azize NAZLıER Antalya   Nebahat LÜLÜ Antalya   Makbule ERTUĞRUL Antalya   Mehmet KARDAM

Türkiye 28/10/2021 Cemal ATALAY 1986 Bursa Turkish Elif KARDEŞ 29. 55067/21 Özkan v. Türkiye 05/11/2021 Mustafa ÖZKAN 1989 Antalya Turkish Muhammet DEMİREL 30. 55203/21 Aşık v.

Si le centre hospitalier produit un rapport critique d’un médecin spécialisé en anesthésie et en réanimation, indiquant que les résultats de la kaliémie n’ont été communiqués qu’à 21h26 alors que M.

Nevertheless, as it has held in previous cases, that does not preclude his complaint in relation to Article 3 from being “arguable” for the purposes of the positive obligation to investigate (see Böke and Kandemir

has held in previous cases, that does not preclude the applicant’s complaint in relation to Article 3 from being “arguable” for the purposes of the positive obligation to investigate (see Böke and Kandemir

has held in previous cases, that does not in principle preclude the complaint in relation to Article 3 from being “arguable” for the purposes of the positive obligation to investigate (see Böke and Kandemir

L’article   5 § 4 de la Convention vise des voies de recours suffisamment certaines, faute de quoi les conditions d’accessibilité et d’effectivité ne seront pas satisfaites ( Kadem c.

during a person’s detention with a view to that person obtaining a speedy judicial review of the lawfulness of his or her detention capable of leading, where appropriate, to his or her release (see Kadem

s60570E66 { width:233.81pt; display:inline-block } .s58B8AE49 { clear:both; mso-column-break-before:always } SECOND SECTION PARTIAL DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 55263/00 by M'hmed KADEM

Mahkemesi üyeligi, yedek üyeligi ve Cumhuriyet       savci yardimciligi görevlerine atanan askeri hakim subaylarin       rütbe terfii, rütbe kidemliligi, kademe

original >        "Devlet Güvenlik Mahkemesi üyeligi, yedek üyeligi ve Cumhuriyet savci yardimciligi görevlerine atanan askeri hakim subaylarin rütbe terfii, rütbe kidemliligi, kademe

before the court examined the applicant’s habeas corpus request did not correspond to the requirement of a speedy judicial decision within the meaning of Article   5 §   4 of the Convention ( Kadem

found violations of the “speediness” requirement of Article 5 § 4 where domestic courts took much less time to examine applications for release than the court in the present case (see, for example, Kadem

  29462/95, §§   85-86, ECHR 2000 ‑ XII ; and Kadem v. Malta , no. 55263/00, §§ 44 and 45, 9 January 2003). 47.

as it has held in previous cases, that does not preclude his complaint in relation to Article   3 from being “arguable” for the purposes of the positive obligation to investigate (see Böke and Kandemir

;        54796/11 20/06/2011 Ahmet ÜÇEK 20/04/1978 Istanbul   Yusuf EYCAN             54801/11 15/07/2011 Taner KANDEMİR

Nevertheless, as it has held in previous cases, that does not preclude this complaint in relation to Article 3 from being “arguable” for the purposes of the positive obligation to investigate (see, Böke and Kandemir

  47     Article 12 de la loi sur les magistrats militaires         "Askeri hakim subaylarin rütbe terfii, rütbe kidemliligi, kademe    

  35892/97, § 38 in limine , 29 June 2000; Kadem v. Malta , no. 55263/00, § 41 in fine , 9 January 2003; and Nasrulloyev , cited above, § 86).