The full text of the Commission’s opinion is reproduced as an annex to this judgment [3] . FINAL SUBMISSIONS TO THE COURT 60.

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Osmanoğlu v.

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Salakhov and Islyamova v.

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Pankov v.

The next day, the couple reported the matter to the police.

At the hearing on 5 May 1993 the applicant agreed to give evidence since the matters which related to her had already been dealt with by the City Court in other ways.

It may be subject to editorial revision . In the case of Orlić v.

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Yaylalı v.

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Al Husin v.

  The facts of the case may be summarised as follows.

Q: Do you ever go to the Claridge? R: Yes, I go there regularly.

    The details concerning the applicants may be found in the Annex. The background to the case 1.     Mr Oliari and Mr A.   10.

All of it goes to the leaders of the cult who keep a close watch on that activity.

Annex to decree no. 52/2007 House rules of the reception centre “1.

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Ţîmpău v.

Kirakosyan, the Representative of the Republic of Armenia on International Legal Matters. 4.     The facts of the case may be summarised as follows. Background to the case 5.

The matter fell within the wide margin of appreciation of the State. 41.

Those statements ... go beyond the limits of an advocate’s role in the proceedings ... and may be legally characterised as abuse of process on account of inappropriate communication.” 14.

MARXER                  G.B.