CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

927 résultats pour « Privitello »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0707JUD001849908

Admin. suprême

7 juillet 2015

7 juillet 2015

  the United Kingdom ((dec), 6788/12, § 45, 13 November 2014), where the Scottish Legal Aid Commission had not found it established that “a privately funded person of modest means would reasonably

Page 34 sur 47

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0531DEC007501212

Admin. suprême

31 mai 2016

31 mai 2016

-49) of the Lease of Flats Act establish a special category of lessees (“protected lessees” – zaštićeni najmoprimci ), namely, those who previously held specially protected tenancies in respect of privately

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0914JUD002934206

Admin. suprême

14 septembre 2010

14 septembre 2010

that moment in a manner compatible with the effective access to the highest administrative court and equal for   parties represented by lawyers appointed under the legal-aid scheme   and by privately

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0914DEC003560597

Admin. suprême

14 septembre 1999

14 septembre 1999

The applicant alleges that the Panel members were already committed publicly and privately to concluded views which made a fair hearing impossible and that this was compounded by the fact that no reasons

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1008JUD000823703

Admin. suprême

8 octobre 2009

8 octobre 2009

    In late November 2001 counsel for the applicant privately commissioned a linguistic expert examination of the articles.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0701DEC002496294

Admin. suprême

1 juillet 1996

1 juillet 1996

This scheme would be based on licences to operate new privately owned environmentally friendly buses, which would be granted to certain categories of physical persons.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0113JUD005247999

Admin. suprême

13 janvier 2009

13 janvier 2009

    The Government submitted that the applicant had been represented by a privately hired lawyer already on 9 May 1996 when he was questioned by the prosecutor.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1205REP002204593

Admin. suprême

5 décembre 1995

5 décembre 1995

respect of      claims to specific sums of money ..... the existence of      which is proven by deed done by a public authority or      privately

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0618DEC004712299

Admin. suprême

18 juin 2002

18 juin 2002

Bestuursrechtspraak ) of the Council of State held, on 24 February 1997, that it had not been established that the State Secretary had given any undertakings about the removal of the dynamic factor concerning privately

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0503JUD003563002

Admin. suprême

3 mai 2011

3 mai 2011

independence of the legal profession from the State that the conduct of the defence is essentially a matter between the defendant and his counsel, whether counsel be appointed under a legal aid scheme or be privately

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0708JUD002851910

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2021

8 juillet 2021

It considers that, notwithstanding that the eviction order in the present case was made in favour of a privately incorporated entity, its issuance constituted State action amounting to an interference

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-109598

Admin. suprême

10 janvier 2012

10 janvier 2012

They underlined that they had not advocated the shifting of borders but had argued in favour of the return of privately owned property, and the trial court had failed to justify why such an opinion could

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1112DEC003255996

Admin. suprême

12 novembre 2002

12 novembre 2002

Under domestic law state-owned companies are not exercising public authority and are essentially comparable with privately-owned companies, both company types being governed by the Act on Limited Liability

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0607DEC004647799

Admin. suprême

7 juin 2001

7 juin 2001

They refer to the fact that the Inquiry was privately commissioned by the agencies which were themselves the subject of investigation and which themselves fixed the terms of reference and appointed the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0724JUD000023806

Admin. suprême

24 juillet 2012

24 juillet 2012

    The Court considers in particular that medical reports obtained from public or privately owned or run medical establishments may be admitted in evidence by the Court in its examination of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0128DEC004398711

Admin. suprême

28 janvier 2020

28 janvier 2020

This has meant that companies incorporated in Serbia and previously owned and controlled by the State have been gradually transformed into privately-owned enterprises. 6 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0518DEC007271301

Admin. suprême

18 mai 2004

18 mai 2004

respondent Government and the observations in reply submitted by the applicant, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant, the Ukrainian Media Group (“Українська Прес-Група”), is a privately-owned

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0923JUD005142408

Admin. suprême

23 septembre 2021

23 septembre 2021

In any case, under domestic law the ADEA, as a local executive authority, had no power to make decisions expropriating privately-owned property (see Akhverdiyev , cited above, § 92; Khalikova , cited above

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0421JUD004740507

Admin. suprême

21 avril 2016

21 avril 2016

Moreover, the building in issue was declared such a monument in 1949 and was privately owned until 1966 (see paragraph 7 above); the fact that it was a monument was known to the Supreme Administrative

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0201JUD003690419

Admin. suprême

1 février 2024

1 février 2024

  Russia , no. 38004/12, §§ 166-72, 17 July 2018, concerning inability to communicate freely and privately with a lawyer during the trial; Tomov and   Others v.

Source officielle