Given the general tenor of the interview and the context in which the offending comments had been made, the Court considered that they were to be regarded as value judgments rather than bald statements

  Summary of the facts     Mr Sürek was charged under section 8 of the Anti-Terror Law 1991 with having disseminated propaganda against the indivisibility of the State by publishing in the

a term of imprisonment and a fine for written work held to contain separatist propaganda against the Turkish nation and the territorial integrity of the State, contrary to section 8(1) of the Anti-Terror

The applicant was charged with disseminating propaganda against the indivisibility of the State contrary to section 8 of the 1991 Anti-Terror Law.

On 15   July 2016 the applicant was arrested and taken into police custody on suspicion of membership of an armed terrorist organisation (“Fetullahist Terror Organisation/Parallel State Structure”

On 21 July 2016 he was detained on account of charges of membership of an organisation described by the Turkish authorities as the “Fetullahist Terror Organisation / Parallel State Structure” ( Fetullahçı

November 2015 and February 2016, they were taken in pre ‑ trial detention on suspicion of financing a terrorist organisation, which the Turkish authorities refer to as FETÖ/PDY (“Fethullahist Terror

The applicants were arrested and taken into custody by the Anti-terror branch of the İzmir Security Directorate on suspicion of membership in an illegal organisation on various dates between 11 and 16

Adresse 6]) ; - dit que cette vente sera poursuivie devant le juge de l'exécution du Tribunal Judiciaire de Draguignan aux clauses et conditions du cahier des charges qui sera dressé par le Cabinet TEGO

was arrested and detained in Sincan Prison following the attempted coup d’état of 2016 on account of charges of membership of an organisation described by the Turkish authorities as the “Fetullahist Terror

Béatrice BERARD, Greffière lors du délibéré NATURE DU JUGEMENT réputée contradictoire et en premier ressort NOM DES PARTIES DEMANDERESSE Organisme FONDS DE GARANTIE DES VICTIMES DES ACTES DE TERROR

, Poralu, Margueron, Dalkia, Lineax, Gerfa, Sofaper, ECB, MJP, Assa Abloy Entrance Systems France, Bureau Veritas, Bureau Veritas Construction, Joris IDE Auvergne, Cosinus, Technique et Construction TECO

On 27 November 1995 the applicant was taken into custody by police officers from the anti-terror branch of the Istanbul Security Directorate on suspicion of membership of an illegal organisation, the Dev-Yol

Il en ressort notamment que le service Telos fut désigné à partir du 1 er mars 2025 pour l’organisation des visites encadrées et que le requérant déplora qu’ «   en dépit des arrêts rendus le 27 &

  Summary of the facts     Mr Sürek was charged under section 6 of the Anti-Terror Law 1991 with having revealed the identity of officials mandated to fight terrorism, thus rendering them

administrative courts failed to observe respect for his right to presumption of innocence because they casted doubt on his established innocence by stating that he had been previously acquitted of a terror-related

It is evident that the policy conducted by Turkey in Kurdistan involves intense State terror.

classement sans suite contesté que la demande de naturalisation formulée par le requérant était incomplète, ne comportant pas une attestation de réussite niveau B1 écrit et oral en cours de validité (TCF ou TEF

  In the case of Vasilev and Society of the Repressed Macedonians in Bulgaria Victims of the Communist Terror v.

On an unspecified date police officers from the anti-terror branch of the Bağcılar Security Directorate reported that Dev-Sol members would hold a demonstration in front of the Hürriyet newspaper’s head