In conclusion, activities such as those involved in the domestic proceedings, relating to data from documents which were in the public domain under national legislation, could be classified as “journalistic

  10 of the Convention.

10 de la Convention).

Les relations contractuelles entre les parties étaient soumises à la convention collective nationale de travail des journalistes, avenant audiovisuel.

Freedoms (“the Convention”) by an Icelandic national, Ms Erla Hlynsdóttir (“the applicant”), on 31 August 2010. 2.

(Alpes-Maritimes), en cassation d'un arrêt rendu le 5 juillet 1983 par la cour d'appel d'Aix-en-Provence (9ème chambre sociale), au profit du Syndicat national des journalistes (SNJ) "Autonome", dont

The Court then examined the essential question whether the journalist had acted in good faith and whether he had fulfilled the obligation – incumbent on all journalists –- to verify a factual statement

  49108/11) against the Russian Federation lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Russian national

Les mesures tombaient donc dans le domaine de la protection des sources journalistiques.

. ; Vu les mémoires produits en demande et en défense ; Sur le moyen unique de cassation, pris de la violation des articles 6 et 7 de la Convention européenne des droits de l'homme, des articles

Guidelines for Journalists The Union of Journalists in Finland ( Suomen Journalistiliitto, Finlands Journalistförbund ry ) publishes Guidelines for Journalists ( Journalistin ohjeet, Journalistreglerna

The Court held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article 10 (freedom of expression) of the European Convention on Human Rights.

les journalistes et de l’audition de ces derniers dans des conditions défavorables à la défense.

’il était journaliste et, donc, formateur d’opinion et que ses antécédents relevaient de l’intérêt public.

  35105/04) against the Republic of Poland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by two Polish nationals

    The applicant alleged a violation of Article 10 of the Convention in connection with his conviction for remarks he made in a newspaper interview. 4.

Protection afforded by that provision of the Convention to journalists is subject to the proviso that they act in good faith in order to provide accurate and reliable information in accordance with the

Il soutient dans ce contexte que sa détention l’empêche de d’exercer sa profession de journaliste d’investigation et l’oblige, comme les autres journalistes surveillant les abus des autorités officielles

The applicant also complains under Article 10 of the Convention that his prosecution and conviction were disproportionate and had a ‘chilling effect’ on freedom of the press and democracy.

“the Convention”) by a Romanian national, Mr Ion Cârstea (“the applicant”), on 3 May 2006. 2.