dans le délibéré de la cour, composée de : Mme Dominique ROSENTHAL, Président, Monsieur François LEPLAT, Conseiller, Monsieur Denis ARDISSON, Conseiller, Greffier, lors des débats : Monsieur Alexandre

The Court observes that these objections were identical to those raised in the case of Alexandrou v. Turkey (no. 16162/90, §§ 11-22, 20 January 2009), and should be dismissed for the same reasons.

In view of the findings in paragraphs 9-13 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 15.

The Court observes that these objections were identical to those raised in the case of Alexandrou v. Turkey (no. 16162/90, §§ 11-22, 20 January 2009), and should be dismissed for the same reasons.

Mario Chizzotti, est un ressortissant italien, né en 1951 et résidant à Carbonara Scrivia (Alessandria). Il est représenté devant la Cour par M e   B. Micolano, avocat à Bologne.

juin 2012 en une chambre composée de   :   Nina Vajić, présidente,   Peer Lorenzen,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia Laffranque,   Linos-Alexandre

05 Juillet 2024 9ème chambre 2ème section N° RG 22/00529 - N° Portalis 352J-W-B7G-CV4DV COMPOSITION DU TRIBUNAL Gilles MALFRE, Premier Vice-Président adjoint Augustin BOUJEKA, Vice-Président Alexandre

GMF ASSURANCES prise en la personne de son représentant légal en exercice domicilié es qualité au siège social sis [Adresse 4] [Localité 11] Représentée par Me Alexandre SALVIGNOL de la SARL SALVIGNOL

#xa0; November 2011 as a Chamber composed of:   Nina Vajić, President,   Anatoly Kovler,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia Laffranque,   Linos-Alexandre

It further declined to deal with the applicant’s complaint finding that it had no prospects of success, and, upon the applicant’s request, remitted the case to the Administrative Court.

  Alexandra Maria Popescu v. Romania (no. 9684/04) Emilian Ştefănescu v. Romania (no. 35018/03) Seceleanu and Others v.

food, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack or inadequate furniture 3,000     55753/16 25/10/2016 Florin-Dorin LINGURAR 1982     Deva

    Article 35 § 1 of the Convention stipulates: “The Court may only deal with the matter after all domestic remedies have been exhausted, according to the generally recognised rules of international

    On 11 October 2006 the Constitutional Court declined to deal with the complaint for lack of any prospect of success.

    The Venice Youth Court found that it remained competent to deal with the case, as the Judenburg District Court had wrongly determined its jurisdiction under Article 15(5) of the Brussels

Romania (n o 1486/02) The applicants, Ioan ‑ Alexandru Orha and Ligia-Mariana Orha, are Romanian nationals who were born in 1955 and 1966 respectively and live in Toronto (Canada).

Romania (no. 57808/00)   Violation of Article 6 § 1 The applicant, Mircea Alexandru Albina, is a Romanian national who was born in 1935 and lives in Bucharest.

In view of the findings in paragraph 13 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 15.

In view of the findings in paragraphs 11 and 13 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints. 15.