CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0325DEC005694408
25 mars 2014
  Lucia PARENTE 18/10/1953 San Giovanni di Ceppaloni   Brunella PARENTE 14/02/1960 Calvi               7828/09 03/02/2009 Salvatore CONSIGLIO
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0917DEC004510410
17 septembre 2015
    62459/10 07/08/2010 Eduardo PELLEGRINO 29/10/1951 Giugliano in Campania Massimo FERRARO              62460/10 07/08/2010 Emilia CONSIGLIO
comm
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2019:CO00717
18 septembre 2019
C-368/04; CJUE 23 janvier 2019 Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri contre Fallimento Traghetti del Mediterraneo SpA, aff.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:001-163116
27 avril 2016
xa0;         Giuseppe PRETE 01/03/1941 Tarante                     Maria Consiglia
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1103JUD003081406
3 novembre 2009
    The applicant appealed to the Consiglio di Stato . 15.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0328JUD001089084
28 mars 1990
On 13 January 1981 the Consiglio di Stato granted an application for a stay of execution pending the proceedings in the Administrative Court, and Radio 24 began broadcasting again on 16 January. 30.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1102JUD003517403
2 novembre 2006
Par un arrêté du 15 décembre 1979, le conseil municipal ( consiglio comunale ) de Terracina approuva le projet de construction d’habitations à loyer modéré sur ce terrain. 8.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0409DEC002333794
9 avril 1997
       Dans l'intervalle, à savoir le 24 mai 1991, le conseil de surveillance (consiglio di vigilanza) avait fixé la libération conditionnelle des requérants au 6 juillet 1991.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0902JUD002583294
2 septembre 1997
On 6   April   1995 the RAC gave judgment against the applicant, who, on a date which has not been specified, appealed to the Consiglio di Stato . The proceedings are still pending.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0802JUD003711997
2 août 2001
    The Palmi public prosecutor’s office sent the National Council of the Judiciary ( Consiglio Superiore della Magistratura ) a list of judges who were Freemasons.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0708DEC000816213
8 juillet 2014
He or she also establishes criteria for the purposes of distributing work between the appeal judges, with their agreement. (4) The Judicial Council ( Consiglio Giudiziario ) approves the criteria drawn
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0304JUD001864010
4 mars 2014
The heading of the judgments delivered in respect of Mr Gabetti, Mr   Marrone and Exor S.p.a. indicated that the court of appeal had met in private ( riunita in camera di consiglio ).
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0228JUD003720106
28 février 2008
An appeal to the Consiglio di Stato lies against decisions of the RAC. 59.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0217JUD003974898
17 février 2004
    In a decision of 10 October 1995, the disciplinary section of the National Council of the Judiciary ( Consiglio Superiore della Magistratura ) found that the applicant had committed the offences
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0227DEC001548889
27 février 1995
  Extrait de l'arrêt n° 801 :         "Conclusivamente, (...), deve essere riconosciuta la       competenza del Consiglio di Stato in tema di
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0117DEC002267193
17 janvier 1997
have to be declared inadmissible for failure to exhaust domestic remedies, the applicant having failed to appeal to the regional administrative court and then to the supreme administrative court (Consiglio
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0902JUD002584094
    On 18   May 1982 he applied to the Calabria Regional Administrative Court (“the RAC”) for judicial review of a decision of the Regional Council ( Consiglio Regionale ) assigning him,
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0902JUD002584194
    On 4   May 1982 he instituted proceedings in the Calabria Regional Administrative Court (“the RAC”) for judicial review of a decision of the Regional Council ( Consiglio Regionale )
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0109DEC002044515
9 janvier 2024
company had not brought proceedings in the Regional Administrative Court and that the second applicant company had failed to appeal against the decision of the Lazio Regional Administrative Court to the Consiglio
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2020:CO00342
24 juin 2020
négociants et transformateurs de saumon contre République française, C-354/90 ; CJCE, 5 octobre 2006, Transalpine Ölleitung in Österreich, C-368/04, point 41; CJUE, 23 janvier 2019, Presidenza del Consiglio
Page 35 sur 38