Soviet Union] agents, I'm not surprised that you defend people who, thanks to their week characteristic qualities, pushed themselves forward to achieve their personally advantageous goals (troughs) (koryta

Türkiye 29/04/2021 Abdullah PAKIR 1971 Konya Turkish   13. 25568/21 Karabıyık v. Türkiye 28/04/2021 Emre KARABIYIK 1985 Balıkesir Turkish   14. 25714/21 Çetin v.

On   3   December 1996 the Public Prosecutor at the Konya State Security Court filed an indictment against the applicant and eleven others, accusing them of being involved in the activities of

Şanlıurfa 38 Zeyniye ÖNER 1958 Mardin 39 Orhan ÖZER 1965 Muş 40 Yurdusev ÖZSÖKMENLER 1952 Diyarbakır 41 Resul SADAK 1959 Şırnak 42 Ethem ŞAHİN 1970 Şanlıurfa 43 Gülcihan ŞİMŞEK 1971 Van 44 Mulla ŞİMŞEK 1964 Konya

R.Yalçındağ Baydemir Gülcihan ŞİMŞEK est une ressortissante turque née en 1971, résidant à Diyarbakır et représentée par R.Yalçındağ Baydemir Mulla ŞİMŞEK est un ressortissant turc né en 1964, résidant à Konya

    Les requérants sont nés respectivement en 1961, 1966, 1959, 1958 et 1938 et résident à Trabzon, Konya et Ankara. 5.

    The applicant was born in 1964 and was detained in the Konya prison in Turkey at the time of the application. In May 2000 he went to Germany and sought asylum.

The Court has also considered whether the case concerned involved an important question of general interest transcending the person and the interests of the applicant (see, for example, Koryak v.

    The applicant and Beogradski Pamučni Kombat , a company based in Belgrade (hereinafter: “the debtor”) concluded a contract on 7 March 2000.

Russia , no. 56027/10, §§ 49-101, 8 January 2013; and Koryak v. Russia , no.   24677/10, §§ 70-110, 13 November 2012).

  56027/10, §§ 49-101, 8 January 2013; and Koryak v. Russia, no.   24677/10, §§   70-110, 13 November 2012).

KOKOSHKINA 28/05/2009 06/11/2009   26436/05 KOLUNOV 09/10/2012 09/01/2013   12987/15 KONDRULIN 20/09/2016 30/01/2017   67086/01 KOROBOV ET AUTRES 27/03/2008 27/06/2008   24677/10 KORYAK

has found that no effective remedies existed in Russia for applicants who complained of ongoing deterioration of their health in view of a lack of proper medical care in detention (see, among others, Koryak

né le 31 Octobre 1944 à KOUMAC (98850) demeurant...-98840 TONTOUTA représenté par la SELARL de GRESLAN COMPOSITION DE LA COUR : L'affaire a été débattue le 24 Juin 2013, en audience publique

Par l'arrêté n° 2096 du 19 octobre 2000, le haut-commissaire de la République en Nouvelle-Calédonie a autorisé la création, entre les communes de Koumac et de Kaala-Gomen, du SIVM Nord qui est soumis aux

  56027/10, §§ 49-101, 8 January 2013; and Koryak v. Russia, no.   24677/10, §§   70-110, 13 November 2012).

Türkiye 16/06/2020 Ali ÇIĞIR 1971 Konya   Lack of reasonable suspicion Failure/delay in examining requests for release/objection during post-conviction detention     54842/20 Celepoğlu v

Türkiye 13/05/2022 İsa ÖNEY 1977 Konya Turkish Cihat ÇITIR Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Restriction of access to the

Türkiye 19/11/2020 Şevket DAĞDAŞ 1961 Konya Turkish Zümrüt ŞAHİN   53148/20 Kahya v. Türkiye 23/11/2020 Veysel KAHYA 1970 Kütahya Turkish Bilal ŞAŞMAZ   53923/20 Ayık v.

Türkiye 28/06/2022 Hüseyin SOYKAN 1972 Konya Turkish Ayşe Süeda ÜNAL 42. 38224/22 Şirikçi v. Türkiye 05/07/2022 Muhammet Ali ŞİRİKÇİ 1989 Kahramanmaraş Turkish Emre KOZANDAĞI 43. 38319/22 Uzuntepe v.