CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0519DEC008145412
19 mai 2022
The Supreme Court found that the 2002 decisions had neither been quashed as unlawful, as required by the law, nor were they discriminatory since the applicant had not suffered any disadvantage compared
Page 36 sur 113
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0512JUD002578194
12 mai 2014
the claims for just satisfaction in the present case. 20.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1211DEC004715616
11 décembre 2018
The rules on the prescription of compensation claims ( deliktische Ansprüche ) apply by analogy to a claim based on Article 5 § 5 of the Convention (see Federal Court of Justice, no.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0414JUD001789908
14 avril 2015
In support of his claims in respect of pecuniary damage, the applicant submitted four lease contracts, each of them concluded for periods of less than three years. 7.
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0222REP002209593
22 février 1995
to bring a claim.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:1002DEC001413788
2 octobre 1989
COMPLAINTS The applicant claims to be a victim of a violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention which, in her view, guarantees the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0727JUD001616190
27 juillet 2010
Solomonides was ... making his claims” and that the claims for just satisfaction concerned only 44 plots of land.
Chambre 1-6
6364b9fce405357f749ea406
27 octobre 2022
Greffier lors des débats : Madame Charlotte COMBARET. Les parties ont été avisées que le prononcé de la décision aurait lieu par mise à disposition au greffe le 27 Octobre 2022.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0412JUD004336202
12 avril 2007
In the resumed proceedings, on 25 July 2005 the Municipal Court gave judgment dismissing the applicants' claim on the merits.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1865464-1958875
12 décembre 2006
The Court did not consider that the applicants could have been expected to have brought a claim for a declaration of incompatibility under section 4 of the 1998 Human Rights Act before bringing
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0201DEC001851202
1 février 2005
Austria , judgment of 16 July 1971, Series A no. 13, pp. 40-41, § 98, as compared with p. 34, § 79, and pp. 39-40, §§ 96-97).
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-250575
13 mai 2026
In particular, did the applicant, who had victim status in the criminal proceedings, pursue civil claims in that case so as to bring the civil limb of Article 6 § 1 into play (see Fabbri and Others v.
PRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2329954-2521654
29 avril 2008
In those circumstances, they could claim to be victims of the alleged discriminatory treatment.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1214JUD001203013
14 décembre 2021
This amount is considerably below compared to the amounts awarded by the Court in cases in which it has found a violation of Articles 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, for example, Cravcenco v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0426JUD007835214
26 avril 2018
The Government submitted that this claim was groundless. 80.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0711DEC007769111
11 juillet 2017
Armed clashes increased by 14 per cent in the first four months of the year compared with the same period in 2015 and were higher for each month compared with previous years.
CASELAW;REPORTS;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0708REP001839091
8 juillet 1993
Toutefois, aux termes de l'article 359 du Code de procédure civile, "les jugements doivent être clairs, précis et répondre aux demandes et autres prétentions présentées pendant le procès...
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0909REP002969796
9 septembre 1998
his original claim, the purchasing power of the monies at stake had significantly decreased.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0130JUD005906521
30 janvier 2024
The SSIF’s claim of 2017 22 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0222REP002208393
Her claim was framed in trespass. 23.