CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1023JUD001305811
23 octobre 2012
His detention was argued to be necessary until the requirements for his expulsion could be secured. 12.
JLD
68643d500bb2f8a66ca64d06
1 juillet 2025
L’intéressé déclare : j’ai vu le médecin hier. On m’a fait une prise de sang hier. J’aimerais retrouver ma liberté. J’ai mon diabéte qui monte tous les jours. Je suis fatigué. Je mange pas bien.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0405DEC003218602
5 avril 2005
his defence rights (judgment no. 304/2002).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0526DEC003333102
26 mai 2005
his defence rights (judgment no.
8e Section - MESD
DTA_2519058_20250804
4 août 2025
Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête et un mémoire, enregistrés les 7 et 24 juillet 2025, accompagnés de pièces complémentaires reçues le 21 juillet 2025, Mme C B, représentée par Me Hiesse, demande
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0206JUD004459998
6 février 2001
His parents live there, as do five of his brothers and a sister. His father is retired and lives on his pension. He has a two-bedroom house. None of the family has a car.
RETENTIONS
653a069dd0451e8318d0ea3c
25 octobre 2023
Il explique qu'il devait avoir une IRM hier mais qu'il n'a pas pu y aller car il n'y avait pas d'escorte de disponible.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-114587
16 octobre 2012
involvement in the present case in his telephone calls to his son and wife.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0711JUD005124911
11 juillet 2017
on his part to the ordering of his detention.”
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0116DEC002164793
16 janvier 1996
application are insufficient to conclude that his right to respect for his family life has been breached.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0628DEC007025801
28 juin 2001
of his detention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1102DEC002136907
2 novembre 2010
On 31   August   2004 the District Court named the expert to render the expert opinion.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0602DEC006730412
2 juin 2015
The applicant tried to maintain contact with his daughter, but his wife systematically hindered his attempts. 6.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1210JUD002107409
10 décembre 2020
During his subsequent questioning as an accused he protested his innocence, asserting that the drugs had not belonged to him.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-13693
14 juin 2022
The applicant should have been able to foresee that his actions could be scrutinised, given his professional occupation, and the legal regulation on the publicity and transparency of public service.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0709DEC007554501
9 juillet 2002
    The applicant also complains that the destruction of his house deprived him of his right to peaceful possession of his property contrary to Article 1 of Protocol No. 1. THE LAW 1.
ECLI:CEDH:001-230469
16 janvier 2023
He submits that the decision designating him to adjudicate in the Chamber of Professional Responsibility, against his will, amounts to a de facto transfer from his judicial office and constitutes a breach
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0616DEC000772012
16 juin 2020
by his signature.
ECLI:CEDH:001-152534
26 janvier 2015
that would be more suited for his health condition and a change of his prison regime to a more restrictive one.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0918DEC003571397
18 septembre 1997
  He also requested that suspensive effect be granted to his complaint.
Page 37 sur 334