Pays-Bas , 2 septembre 1998, § 52, Recueil   1998-VI, , Baranowski , précité, § 52, et Minjat c. Suisse , n o   38223/97, § 40, 28   octobre 2003).

proper procedure, namely that any measure depriving a person of his liberty should issue from and be executed by an appropriate authority and should not be arbitrary (see, among other authorities, Baranowski

    Relying on Baranowski v.

Baranowski v. Poland, no. 28358/95, §§ 50-58, ECHR 2000 ‑ III)?   3.

In such cases the Court can and should exercise a certain power to review whether national law has been observed (see Baranowski v. Poland , no. 28358/95, § 50, ECHR 2000‑III). 12.

including those brought against Poland, its practice concerning complaints about the length of the proceedings by which a person seeks to challenge the lawfulness of his detention (see, for example, Baranowski

Le Gouvernement souligne à cet égard, se référant à l'affaire Baranowski c.

Lusset, rapporteur public, - et les observations de Me Barakowska, substituant Me Weygand, représentant la société Transports Khoch. Considérant ce qui suit : 1.

    The Court recalls that in its judgment of 28   March 2000 in the case of Baranowski v.

également appuyer l'idée que la détention qui est prolongée au-delà de la période initiale envisagée au paragraphe 3 appelle l'intervention d'un « tribunal » comme garantie contre l'arbitraire ( Baranowski

Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its findings in Baranowski v.   Poland , no.

    59805/14 21/08/2014 Jerzy HERMANN 27/02/1939 Sulejówek   Represented by Jacek BARANOWSKI Administrative proceedings concerning compensation for property expropriated on the ground of

proclaims their right, following the institution of such proceedings, to a speedy judicial decision concerning the lawfulness of detention and the ordering of its termination if it proves unlawful (see Baranowski

following the institution of such proceedings, to a speedy judicial decision concerning the lawfulness of detention precisely and the ordering of its termination if it proves unlawful (see   Baranowski

Pologne 30/07/2018 Anna Maria HANDZ 1961 Wilczyce Polonais     9 37950/18 Baranowska c. Pologne 28/07/2018 Regina BARANOWSKA 1972 Legnica polonais   10 38077/18 Ogłodzińska c.

The Government maintained that in the Baranowski v.

including those brought against Poland, its practice concerning complaints about the length of the proceedings by which a persons seeks to challenge the lawfulness of his detention (see, for example, Baranowski

proclaims their right, following the institution of such proceedings, to a speedy judicial decision concerning the lawfulness of detention and the ordering of its termination if it proves unlawful (see Baranowski

proclaims their right, following the institution of such proceedings, to a speedy judicial decision concerning the lawfulness of detention and the ordering of its termination if it proves unlawful (see Baranowski