CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

53 718 résultats pour « Julie THERY »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0330JUD000587808

Admin. suprême

30 mars 2016

30 mars 2016

In the context of the events of 7 July and 21 July when, respectively, there had been a successful detonation and an attempted detonation of bombs on buses it was a failure of the management of the operation

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0522DEC005054108

Admin. suprême

22 mai 2012

22 mai 2012

to have been manufactured) because they had been there already.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3526

Admin. suprême

12 janvier 2006

12 janvier 2006

not only available in theory but also in practice.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0303DEC001354516

Admin. suprême

3 mars 2020

3 mars 2020

At the hearing, M.P. and J.J., hierarchical superiors of the second applicant, testified that on the afternoon of 1 July 2015, as they had approached the border-crossing point, they had seen a person in

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1019JUD004913911

Admin. suprême

19 octobre 2021

19 octobre 2021

Investigative actions in respect of theory (a) 11 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0221JUD002342394

Admin. suprême

21 février 2002

21 février 2002

On 23 July 1993, he and other guards were told to come as there was a clash. On their arrival at the Hista stream area they found two injured persons.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-111334

Admin. suprême

28 septembre 2010

28 septembre 2010

I also considered their explanations of Jean Charles’s movements when they approached him, to see if there was evidence that they had fabricated those accounts to justify their actions.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1647070-1725698

Admin. suprême

11 avril 2006

11 avril 2006

They relied on Article 5 (right to liberty and security).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-204299

Admin. suprême

7 juillet 2020

7 juillet 2020

There was no toilet or tables. Trial On 26   July 2016 the Moscow Circuit Military Court fixed the jury trial for 24   August 2016.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0827DEC007703301

Admin. suprême

27 août 2002

27 août 2002

In July 1992, they decided that he could remain with them as a foster child while attending boarding school most of the year.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1020DEC000546907

Admin. suprême

20 octobre 2009

20 octobre 2009

The police did not demolish the remaining four sheds but warned those living there that should they not leave the area, their sheds would also be demolished.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1019DEC000138403

Admin. suprême

19 octobre 2006

19 octobre 2006

It found that the courts’ decisions had been based on the law and that they had not interfered with the applicants’ property rights, since they had not been deprived of their ownership. B.

Source officielle
CC

civ3

ECLI:FR:CCASS:2024:C300409

Cassation

11 juillet 2024

11 juillet 2024

Installations thermiques de génie climatique y compris ramonage et aérotherme, à l'exclusion de la pose de capteurs solaires », mais qu'il n'avait pas déclaré exercer l'activité « 32.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-157727

Admin. suprême

11 septembre 2015

11 septembre 2015

Before the migration authorities, they claimed that they were Christians and thus would risk persecution on religious grounds upon return to their home country due to the poor security situation there.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0113JUD001091905

Admin. suprême

13 janvier 2011

13 janvier 2011

Likewise, they did not provide any evidence that there existed relevant domestic practice on the subject. 31.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-235249

Admin. suprême

25 juin 2024

25 juin 2024

In July 2023 the applicants applied to the Swedish authorities, claiming that there were impediments to the enforcement of the deportation order, relying on alleged risks they faced upon return and their

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2546710-2771394

Admin. suprême

19 novembre 2008

19 novembre 2008

  Loizides In July 1974 Andreas Loizides was serving in a battalion which was moved to the Lapithos area to support Greek Cypriot forces there.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0624DEC005222313

Admin. suprême

24 juin 2014

24 juin 2014

The Court will next consider whether there would be insurmountable obstacles to the return of the first five applicants to Nigeria should they wish to resume their family life there.

Source officielle
CA

Chambre sociale 4-5

69eaf9a1cdc6046d4756a85c

Appel

21 avril 2026

21 avril 2026

DESSAISISSEMENT N° RG 24/02948 - N° Portalis DBV3-V-B7I-WZZZ Minute : n° Dans le cadre de la mise en état de la Chambre sociale 4-5 de la cour d'appel de Versailles du 21 Avril 2026 Nous Thierry

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0710JUD002750407

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2012

10 juillet 2012

    On 11 and 12 July 2004 the investigators questioned the applicants’ neighbours, Mr Z.G., Ms R.M. and Mr A.I., all of whom stated that they had not witnessed the abduction, but that they had

Source officielle

Page 4 sur 2686

← PrécédentSuivant →

BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.