CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0330JUD000587808
30 mars 2016
In the context of the events of 7 July and 21 July when, respectively, there had been a successful detonation and an attempted detonation of bombs on buses it was a failure of the management of the operation
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0522DEC005054108
22 mai 2012
to have been manufactured) because they had been there already.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3526
12 janvier 2006
not only available in theory but also in practice.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0303DEC001354516
3 mars 2020
At the hearing, M.P. and J.J., hierarchical superiors of the second applicant, testified that on the afternoon of 1 July 2015, as they had approached the border-crossing point, they had seen a person in
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1019JUD004913911
19 octobre 2021
Investigative actions in respect of theory (a) 11 .
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0221JUD002342394
21 février 2002
On 23 July 1993, he and other guards were told to come as there was a clash. On their arrival at the Hista stream area they found two injured persons.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-111334
28 septembre 2010
I also considered their explanations of Jean Charles’s movements when they approached him, to see if there was evidence that they had fabricated those accounts to justify their actions.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1647070-1725698
11 avril 2006
They relied on Article 5 (right to liberty and security).
ECLI:CEDH:001-204299
7 juillet 2020
There was no toilet or tables. Trial On 26   July 2016 the Moscow Circuit Military Court fixed the jury trial for 24   August 2016.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0827DEC007703301
27 août 2002
In July 1992, they decided that he could remain with them as a foster child while attending boarding school most of the year.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1020DEC000546907
20 octobre 2009
The police did not demolish the remaining four sheds but warned those living there that should they not leave the area, their sheds would also be demolished.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1019DEC000138403
19 octobre 2006
It found that the courts’ decisions had been based on the law and that they had not interfered with the applicants’ property rights, since they had not been deprived of their ownership. B.
civ3
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2024:C300409
11 juillet 2024
Installations thermiques de génie climatique y compris ramonage et aérotherme, à l'exclusion de la pose de capteurs solaires », mais qu'il n'avait pas déclaré exercer l'activité « 32.
ECLI:CEDH:001-157727
11 septembre 2015
Before the migration authorities, they claimed that they were Christians and thus would risk persecution on religious grounds upon return to their home country due to the poor security situation there.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0113JUD001091905
13 janvier 2011
Likewise, they did not provide any evidence that there existed relevant domestic practice on the subject. 31.
ECLI:CEDH:001-235249
25 juin 2024
In July 2023 the applicants applied to the Swedish authorities, claiming that there were impediments to the enforcement of the deportation order, relying on alleged risks they faced upon return and their
PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2546710-2771394
19 novembre 2008
  Loizides In July 1974 Andreas Loizides was serving in a battalion which was moved to the Lapithos area to support Greek Cypriot forces there.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0624DEC005222313
24 juin 2014
The Court will next consider whether there would be insurmountable obstacles to the return of the first five applicants to Nigeria should they wish to resume their family life there.
Chambre sociale 4-5
69eaf9a1cdc6046d4756a85c
21 avril 2026
DESSAISISSEMENT N° RG 24/02948 - N° Portalis DBV3-V-B7I-WZZZ Minute : n° Dans le cadre de la mise en état de la Chambre sociale 4-5 de la cour d'appel de Versailles du 21 Avril 2026 Nous Thierry
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0710JUD002750407
10 juillet 2012
    On 11 and 12 July 2004 the investigators questioned the applicants’ neighbours, Mr Z.G., Ms R.M. and Mr A.I., all of whom stated that they had not witnessed the abduction, but that they had
Page 4 sur 2686
BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.