} .sE4B66E67 { width:21.73pt; display:inline-block }     AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF             Application No. 37527/97         by Jiří KUCHAŘ

Par un mémoire, enregistré le 30 avril 2022, la société Portalp, représentée par Me Kucharz, demande au juge des référés de : 1°) prononcer sa mise hors de cause ; 2°) lui donner acte de ses protestations

  76 and 82, and Kuchař and Štis v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no.   37527/97, 23   May 2000, unreported).

Nikolayevna Krupko 15/09/1974 Olena Mykolayivna Ashchenko Kharkiv 08/06/2010   pending   More than 7 years 2 levels of jurisdiction 1,800     34595/16 09/06/2016 Volodymyr Anatoliyovych Kuchay

it is the very function of the courts to determine such disputes, the regulation of which falls within the province of domestic law and outside the scope of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis , Kuchař

France , (déc.), n o 43275/98, 11 mai 2000   ; Commission européenne des droits de l’homme, Kuchar et Stis   c.

Aux seize arrêts mentionnés dans la décision finale sur la recevabilité de la requête Kuchař et Štis c.

In addition to the sixteen judgments mentioned in the final decision on admissibility in the case of Kuchař and Štis v. the Czech Republic (application no. 37527/97, 23 May 2000, unreported) they referred

La Cour estime dans ce cas qu’il ne peut être retenu aucune ingérence de l’Etat en violation des droits protégés par l’article   1 du Protocole n o 1 ( Kuchar et Stis   c.

Elle estime dans ce cas qu’il ne peut être retenu aucune ingérence de l’Etat en violation des droits protégés par l’article 1 du Protocole n o 1 (voir par exemple Kuchar et Stis   c.

  32806/24 02/08/2022 Oleksiy Volodymyrovych KOROTKEVYCH 1993       Private house and outbuildings (barn, summer kitchen) (47.1 sq. m) at 19A Zarichchia St, Kukhari village, Vyshhorod

when the former Czech and Slovak Federal Republic, to which the Czech Republic is one of the successor states, ratified the Convention and recognised the right of individual application (see, e.g., Kuchař

system, provided a forum for the determination of such a private law dispute does not give rise to an interference by the State with property rights under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see, for example, Kuchař

  76, at p. 82, Kuchař and Štis v. Czech Republic (dec.), 37527/97, 23   May 2000, Horvat v. Croatia , no. 51585/99, §§ 47 and 64, ECHR 2001 ‑ VIII and Hartman v.

margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sF29C8316 { width:19.88pt; display:inline-block } TROISIÈME SECTION   DÉCISION FINALE   SUR LA RECEVABILITÉ   de la requête n° 37527/97 présentée par Jiří KUCHAŘ

  23166/04, 13 January 2011) and two cases cited therein, Kuchař and Štis v. Czech Republic ((dec.), no. 37527/ 97, 21 October 1998), and S.Ö., A.K., Ar.K. and Y.S.P.E.H.V. v.

it is the very function of the courts to determine such disputes, the regulation of which falls within the province of domestic law and outside the scope of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis , Kuchar

Poland , no. 24559/94, Commission decision of 6 September 1995, Decisions and Reports 82, p. 76, at p. 82, Kuchař and Štis v. the Czech Republic (dec.), 37527/97, 23 May 2000, Horvat v.

2010 Enforced   69034/14 20/10/2014 Oksana Oleksandrivna STAKAN 08/02/1971 Korosten Ukrainian Korosten Local Court of Zhytomyr Region, 03/03/2010 Enforced   70515/14 24/10/2014 Ivan Adamovych KUCHA