IN LIQUIDAZIONE 1994 Arezzo Italian Andrea SACCUCCI 4. 55927/19 TAMI Immobiliare S.r.l. v. Italy 12/10/2019 TAMI IMMOBILIARE S.R.L. 2012 Arezzo Italian Andrea SACCUCCI 5. 56133/19 ME.PR.INT S.r.l. v.

Jean Zuccarelli 20406 BASTIA CEDEX 9 Représentée par Mme Antoinette Y..., munie d'un pouvoir, INTIME : Monsieur Armand X... ... ... 20200 SAN MARTINO DI LOTA Représenté par Me Stéphanie SALDUCCI

on the applicants’ right of access to a lawyer during the pre-trial stage pursuant to Law no. 3842 and the subsequent use by the trial court of those statements taken in the absence of a lawyer (see Salduz

on the applicant’s right of access to a lawyer during the pre-trial stage pursuant to Law no. 3842 and the subsequent use by the trial court of his statements taken in the absence of a lawyer (see Salduz

on the applicant’s right of access to a lawyer during the pre-trial stage pursuant to Law no. 3842 and the subsequent use by the trial court of those statements taken in the absence of a lawyer (see Salduz

  3842 and the subsequent use by the trial court of those statements taken in the absence of a lawyer (see Salduz v.

Turquie (requête n o 36391/02)   Le requérant, Yusuf Salduz, est un ressortissant turc né en 1984 et résidant à Izmir (Turquie).

#Amministrazione delle Finanze vastaan Srl Meridionale Industria Salumi, Fratelli Vasanelli ja Fratelli Ultrocchi.#Corte suprema di Cassazionen esittämä ennakkoratkaisupyyntö.

It however added that Salduz should not apply retroactively to cases which had become res judicata.

(see Salduz v.   Turkey [GC], no.   36391/02, ECHR   2008, and İbrahim and Others v.   the United Kingdom [GC], nos.   50541/08 and 3   others, ECHR   2016).

  3842 (see Salduz v. Turkey [GC], no. 36391/02, ECHR 2008, and Ibrahim and   Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 50541/08 and 3 others, ECHR   2016).

on the applicant’s right of access to a lawyer during the pre-trial stage pursuant to Law no. 3842 and the subsequent use by the trial court of those statements taken in the absence of a lawyer (see Salduz

on the applicant’s right of access to a lawyer during the pre-trial stage pursuant to Law no. 3842 and the subsequent use by the trial court of the statements taken in the absence of a lawyer (see Salduz

on the applicant’s right of access to a lawyer during the pre-trial stage pursuant to Law no. 3842 and the subsequent use by the trial court of those statements taken in the absence of a lawyer (see Salduz

on the applicant’s right of access to a lawyer during the pre-trial stage pursuant to Law no. 3842 and the subsequent use by the trial court of the statements taken in the absence of a lawyer (see Salduz

  50541/08 and 3   others, ECHR 2016; Salduz v. Turkey [GC], no.   36391/02, ECHR 2008, and Aras v. Turkey (no. 2) , no.   15065/07, 18   November 2014).

view of the admission of the evidence of the safety interviews at trial, and in particular:   (a) were there “compelling reasons” to justify restrictions to the right of access to a lawyer (see Salduz

on the applicant’s right of access to a lawyer during the pre-trial stage pursuant to Law no. 3842 and the subsequent use by the trial court of the statements taken in the absence of a lawyer (see Salduz

on the applicants’ right of access to a lawyer during the pre-trial stage pursuant to Law no. 3842 and the subsequent use by the trial court of those statements taken in the absence of a lawyer (see Salduz

Cases accepted by the Grand Chamber   Salduz v. Turkey The applicant, Yusuf Salduz, is a Turkish national who was born in 1984 and is living in Izmir (Turkey).