Article 71 – Secondary penalty “The secondary penalty shall consist in disqualification from exercising all the rights listed in Article 64. (2)     A life sentence or any other prison sentence

; - la décision méconnait l’article 64§2 de l’accord d’association entre l’Union européenne et le Royaume du Maroc du 26 février 1996.

Article 6§1 et 64§2 du décret du 14/10/1955.»

64 § 2) ainsi que de l’égalité de traitement et de la non-discrimination (article 32).

    S’agissant du manquement [à l’obligation] d’introduire un recours dans le délai imparti, l’article 64 § 2 du règlement admet comme motif valable un cas de force majeure ou une maladie grave

    Articles 64 § 2 and 379 provide that in a case where the prosecution has already been taken over by a subsidiary prosecutor, the public prosecutor shall nevertheless have the power, up until

64 § 2 of the Banks Act.

Article 64 sets out the cases for alienation of plots of land owned by the State and the communities through donation of the right of ownership and Article 65 sets out the relevant procedure.

According to article 64 § 1 of the Federal Court Act, the court exempts a party who does not have sufficient financial means from the requirement to pay an advance on court fees provided that the intended

In that case the proceedings have to continue (Article 21 § 2 of the Code of 1974, presently replaced by Article 24 § 2 of the Code of 2005). 3.

    Article 56, paragraph 2, sets out that a sentence of imprisonment may have a duration of between two months and twenty years.

rejet

    L’article 64 (2) du CPP oblige le procureur à assurer la comparution immédiate du prévenu devant le tribunal compétent pour son placement en détention provisoire.

64 § 2 of the CCP).

64 § 2) and equal treatment and non-discrimination (Article 32).

The charge under Article 108 § 2 apparently read as follows: “... an offence under Article 108 § 2 in conjunction with Article 26 § 1 of [the Criminal Code] for having, on 29 May 2018 and 2 June 2018,

    Article 64 of the Code of Criminal Procedure regulates a restoration of a time-limit ( navrátenie lehoty ) as follows.

    The Court finds that this reservation is valid in the light of Article 57 § 1 of the Convention (formerly Article 64 § 1) and that there is no indication that the reservation does not comply

222 of the 1952 Code of Civil Procedure, superseded by Article 300 of the 2007 Code of Civil Procedure, and Article 372 § 2 of the 1974 Code of Criminal Procedure, superseded by Article 413 § 2 of the

  This judgment has become final under Article 44 § 2 of the Convention.