The Commission has declared admissible the applicant's complaints:   -   that his right to freedom of expression had been violated;   -   that he had not had access to a tribunal

It followed that the Constitutional Court had not adequately remedied the violation it had found. 40 .

He stated that it had been alleged that all three had been opened in error but that he considered that opening was happening too often for it to be an accident.

VILA AMIGÓ     Mrs   M. HION     MM   R. NICOLINI       A. ARABADJIEV   13.

In any case, from the moment the company had been informed of that refusal it had had ample time to comment thereon in the proceedings before the Appeals Division.   31.

VILA AMIGÓ   12.

As the applicant had not returned to Turkey after the respective decisions had become final, his submissions were irrelevant.

  The order can be challenged by a complaint which has suspensive effect.

   Its conclusion that, in the case at issue, the property, which had been included in a list of estates expropriated under the 1945 Saxony Decree on Agricultural Land Reform, had been in fact

The police had made a referral to Ms M.

She submitted that the applicant had been involved in civil proceedings relating to his failure to pay salaries to his employees and that the court had found against him.

  As a result the indictment against the applicant had to be modified to exclude the accusation that he had acted with an accomplice.

    Insofar as the applicant had requested an expert who would not be a judge, the Administrative Appeals Commission found that the applicant had not substantiated her request.

and as second - subsidiary - question whether he had committed premeditated homicide, had been incorrect.

as oral testimony, which has been submitted.

The property consisted of a plot of land of 47,99 ha and several buildings, including a house.

VILA AMIGÓ            Mrs.   M. HION            Mr.    R.

VILA AMIGÓ              Ms.    M.-T.

  The case therefore returned to the procedural stage where the council's decision of 17 May 1993 had been made and challenged by the neighbour.